Suppr超能文献

天真的黑猩猩独立习得“棒击”行为。

Individual acquisition of "stick pounding" behavior by naïve chimpanzees.

机构信息

Department for Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, The University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Primatol. 2019 Jul;81(6):e22987. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22987. Epub 2019 May 13.

Abstract

Many studies investigating culture in nonhuman animals tend to focus on the inferred need of social learning mechanisms that transmit the form of a behavior to explain the population differences observed in wild animal behavioral repertoires. This research focus often results in studies overlooking the possibility of individuals being able to develop behavioral forms without requiring social learning. The disregard of individual learning abilities is most clearly observed in the nonhuman great ape literature, where there is a persistent claim that chimpanzee behaviors, in particular, require various forms of social learning mechanisms. These special social learning abilities have been argued to explain the acquisition of the relatively large behavioral repertoires observed across chimpanzee populations. However, current evidence suggests that although low-fidelity social learning plays a role in harmonizing and stabilizing the frequency of behaviors within chimpanzee populations, some (if not all) of the forms that chimpanzee behaviors take may develop independently of social learning. If so, they would be latent solutions-behavioral forms that can (re-)emerge even in the absence of observational opportunities, via individual (re)innovations. Through a combination of individual and low-fidelity social learning, the population-wide patterns of behaviors observed in great ape species are then established and stably maintained. This is the Zone of Latent Solutions (ZLS) hypothesis. The current study experimentally tested the ZLS hypothesis for pestle pounding, a wild chimpanzee behavior. We tested the reinnovation of this behavior in semi-wild chimpanzees at Chimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage in Zambia, Africa, (N = 90, tested in four social groups). Crucially, all subjects were naïve to stick pounding before testing. Three out of the four tested groups reinnovated stick pounding-clearly demonstrating that this behavioral form does not require social learning. These findings provide support for the ZLS hypothesis alongside further evidence for the individual learning abilities of chimpanzees.

摘要

许多研究非人类动物文化的倾向于关注推断的社会学习机制的需求,这些机制将行为的形式传递出去,以解释在野生动物行为库中观察到的群体差异。这种研究重点往往导致研究忽略了个体在不需要社会学习的情况下发展行为形式的可能性。个体学习能力的忽视在非人类类人猿文献中最为明显,其中一直存在一种说法,即黑猩猩的行为,特别是需要各种形式的社会学习机制。这些特殊的社会学习能力被认为可以解释在黑猩猩群体中观察到的相对较大的行为库的获得。然而,目前的证据表明,尽管低保真度的社会学习在协调和稳定黑猩猩群体内行为的频率方面发挥了作用,但黑猩猩行为所采取的某些(如果不是全部)形式可能独立于社会学习而发展。如果是这样,它们将是潜在的解决方案-行为形式,即使在没有观察机会的情况下,也可以通过个体(重新)创新而重新出现。通过个体和低保真度社会学习的结合,然后建立并稳定维持在大型类人猿物种中观察到的行为的群体模式。这就是潜在解决方案区(ZLS)假设。本研究通过实验测试了 ZLS 假设,针对的是杵击行为,这是一种野生黑猩猩的行为。我们在非洲赞比亚的奇姆芬希野生动物孤儿院(Chimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage)的半野生黑猩猩中测试了这种行为的再创新,(N=90,在四个社会群体中进行测试)。至关重要的是,所有的被试在测试前都对棍棒敲击一无所知。四个测试的群体中有三个重新创新了棍棒敲击-这清楚地表明这种行为形式不需要社会学习。这些发现为 ZLS 假设提供了支持,同时也为黑猩猩的个体学习能力提供了进一步的证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验