Suppr超能文献

电针强度对膝骨关节炎慢性疼痛患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of intensity of electroacupuncture on chronic pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

出版信息

Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 14;21(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1899-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is impaired in people with chronic pain such as knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The purpose of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to investigate whether strong electroacupuncture (EA) was more effective on chronic pain by strengthening the CPM function than weak EA or sham EA in patients with KOA.

METHODS

In this multicenter, three-arm parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 301 patients with KOA were randomly assigned. Patients were randomized into three groups based on EA current intensity: strong EA (> 2 mA), weak EA (< 0.5 mA), and sham EA (non-acupoint). Treatments consisted of five sessions per week, for 2 weeks. Primary outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS), CPM function, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

RESULTS

Three hundred one patients with KOA were randomly assigned, among which 271 (90.0%) completed the study (mean age 63.93 years old). One week of EA had a clinically important improvement in VAS and WOMAC but not in CPM function. After 2 weeks treatment, EA improved VAS, CPM, and WOMAC compared with baseline. Compared with sham EA, weak EA (3.8; 95% CI 3.45, 4.15; P < .01) and strong EA (13.54; 95% CI 13.23, 13.85; P < .01) were better in improving CPM function. Compared with weak EA, strong EA was better in enhancing CPM function (9.73; 95% CI 9.44, 10.02; P < .01), as well as in reducing VAS and total WOMAC score.

CONCLUSION

EA should be administered for at least 2 weeks to exert a clinically important effect on improving CPM function of KOA patients. Strong EA is better than weak or sham EA in alleviating pain intensity and inhibiting chronic pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR-ICR-14005411 ), registered on 31 October 2014.

摘要

背景

条件性疼痛调制(CPM)在膝骨关节炎(KOA)等慢性疼痛患者中受损。本随机对照临床试验的目的是探讨强电针对慢性疼痛的疗效是否优于弱电针或假电针对 KOA 患者的 CPM 功能增强。

方法

在这项多中心、三臂平行、单盲随机对照临床试验中,301 例 KOA 患者被随机分组。根据电流量强度将患者随机分为三组:强电针(>2 mA)、弱电针(<0.5 mA)和假电针(非穴位)。治疗包括每周 5 次,持续 2 周。主要观察指标为视觉模拟评分(VAS)、CPM 功能和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)。

结果

301 例 KOA 患者被随机分配,其中 271 例(90.0%)完成了研究(平均年龄 63.93 岁)。电针治疗 1 周可显著改善 VAS 和 WOMAC,但对 CPM 功能无影响。治疗 2 周后,电针治疗可改善 VAS、CPM 和 WOMAC 与基线相比。与假电针相比,弱电针(3.8;95%CI 3.45,4.15;P<.01)和强电针(13.54;95%CI 13.23,13.85;P<.01)在改善 CPM 功能方面更有效。与弱电针相比,强电针在增强 CPM 功能方面(9.73;95%CI 9.44,10.02;P<.01),以及降低 VAS 和 WOMAC 总分方面更有效。

结论

电针治疗至少 2 周可显著改善 KOA 患者的 CPM 功能。强电针在缓解疼痛强度和抑制慢性疼痛方面优于弱电针或假电针。

试验注册

本研究在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR-ICR-14005411)注册,注册日期为 2014 年 10 月 31 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a33/6518678/1d408fadfad1/13075_2019_1899_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验