Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Tohon, Ehime, Japan.
Shock. 2019 Jun;51(6):713-717. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001230.
We analyzed the Nationwide Registry database on sepsis to examine the effects of an anticoagulation therapy, especially with rh-thrombomodulin (rh-TM) and/or antithrombin (AT) III agent, in septic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) patients. In 3,193 patients enrolled after the exclusion, we investigated the association with in-hospital mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. DIC was diagnosed using the Japanese Association of Acute Medicine (JAAM) and the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria. To analyze the separate treatment effects of rh-TM and/or AT III, we excluded the data of 345 patients treated with all available anticoagulation treatments (rh-TM and/or AT III plus "other anticoagulants": protease inhibitors and heparin/heparinoids). The DIC criterion populations were as follows: JAAM DICs, n = 1,891 and ISTH DICs (overt DIC), n = 1,002. Septic DIC patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1, no anticoagulation therapy for DIC; Group 2, received rh-TM and/or AT III; and Group 3, received only "other anticoagulants." In JAAM DIC patients, Group 2 did not show an independent association with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-1.01]) as compared with Group 1. However, in ISTH DIC patients, Group 2 showed an inverse association with the risk of in-hospital mortality (HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.60-0.92) as compared with Group 1, but the same was not true for Group 3 (HR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.47-1.14). The present results support previous findings of the beneficial effects of anticoagulation therapies in septic DIC, also expands the importance of using rh-TM and/or AT agent for septic overt DIC.
我们分析了全国脓毒症登记数据库,以研究抗凝治疗,特别是 rh-血栓调节蛋白(rh-TM)和/或抗凝血酶(AT)III 制剂,对脓毒症弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)患者的影响。在排除后纳入的 3193 例患者中,我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型调查了与院内死亡率的相关性。DIC 采用日本急性医学协会( JAAM)和国际血栓与止血学会( ISTH)标准诊断。为了分析 rh-TM 和/或 AT III 单独治疗效果,我们排除了 345 例接受所有可用抗凝治疗( rh-TM 和/或 AT III 加“其他抗凝剂”:蛋白酶抑制剂和肝素/肝素类)的患者的数据。DIC 标准人群如下: JAAM DICs,n=1891; ISTH DICs(显性 DIC),n=1002。脓毒症 DIC 患者分为 3 组:第 1 组,DIC 无抗凝治疗;第 2 组,接受 rh-TM 和/或 AT III;第 3 组,仅接受“其他抗凝剂”。在 JAAM DIC 患者中,与第 1 组相比,第 2 组与降低院内死亡率的风险无关(风险比[HR]:0.86;95%置信区间[CI]:0.73-1.01])。然而,在 ISTH DIC 患者中,与第 1 组相比,第 2 组与院内死亡率的风险呈负相关(HR 0.74;95%CI:0.60-0.92),但第 3 组则不然(HR 0.73;95%CI:0.47-1.14)。本研究结果支持先前关于抗凝治疗对脓毒症 DIC 有益的发现,并进一步证实了 rh-TM 和/或 AT 制剂在治疗脓毒症显性 DIC 中的重要性。