Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Jul 17;32(8):769-776. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz057.
Greater arterial stiffness is associated independently with increased cardiovascular disease risk. The American Heart Association (AHA) has recommended following "Life's Simple 7 (LS7)" to optimize cardiovascular health; we tested whether better LS7 in middle age is associated with less arterial stiffness in later life.
We studied 4,232 black and white participants aged 45-64 years at the baseline (1987-89) visit of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort who also had arterial stiffness measured in 2011-13 (mean ± SD interval: 23.6 ± 1.0 years). We calculated a 14-point summary score for baseline LS7 and classified participants as having "poor" (0-4), "average" (5-9), or "ideal" (10-14) cardiovascular health. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for arterial stiffening: a high carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV, ≥13.23 m/s) or a high central pulse pressure (central PP, ≥ 82.35 mm Hg).
The age, race, sex, and heart rate-adjusted ORs (95% CI) for high cfPWV in the "ideal," "average," and "poor" LS7 summary categories were 1 (Reference), 1.30 (1.11, 1.53), and 1.68 (1.10,2.56), respectively (P-trend = 0.0003). Similarly, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) for high central PP across LS7 summary categories were 1 (Reference), 1.48 (1.27, 1.74), and 1.63 (1.04, 2.56), respectively (P-trend <0.0001).
Greater LS7 score in middle age is associated with less arterial stiffness 2-3 decades later. These findings further support the AHA recommendation to follow LS7 for cardiovascular disease prevention.
较大的动脉僵硬与心血管疾病风险的增加独立相关。美国心脏协会(AHA)建议遵循“生命的简单 7 项(LS7)”来优化心血管健康;我们测试了中年时期更好的 LS7 是否与晚年时期较少的动脉僵硬有关。
我们研究了参加动脉粥样硬化风险社区研究队列的 4232 名黑人和白人参与者,他们在基线(1987-89 年)访视时年龄为 45-64 岁,并且在 2011-13 年期间测量了动脉僵硬度(平均 ± SD 间隔:23.6 ± 1.0 年)。我们为基线 LS7 计算了一个 14 分的综合评分,并将参与者分为“差”(0-4 分)、“平均”(5-9 分)或“理想”(10-14 分)心血管健康组。我们使用逻辑回归计算动脉僵硬的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI):颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度(cfPWV,≥13.23m/s)或中心脉搏压(central PP,≥82.35mmHg)较高。
年龄、种族、性别和心率校正后的 cfPWV 高的 OR(95%CI)在“理想”、“平均”和“差”LS7 综合分类中的分别为 1(参考)、1.30(1.11,1.53)和 1.68(1.10,2.56)(P 趋势=0.0003)。同样,LS7 综合分类中高中央 PP 的调整后 OR(95%CI)分别为 1(参考)、1.48(1.27,1.74)和 1.63(1.04,2.56)(P 趋势 <0.0001)。
中年时期 LS7 评分较高与 2-3 十年后动脉僵硬程度较低有关。这些发现进一步支持 AHA 建议遵循 LS7 来预防心血管疾病。