Dos Santos Renata Oliveira Maciel, Ramos Danielle Nogueira, de Assis Mônica
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José de Alencar Gomes da Silva, Divisão de Detecção Precoce e Apoio à Organização de Rede, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Dec 27;42:e122. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.122. eCollection 2018.
To describe the process of shared development of a prostate cancer education booklet.
A participant observation study was performed with a convenience sample which initially included a group of 16 co-workers (15 men and one woman) to gather information for the development of educational material. The first draft was assessed by eight specialists (five specialists in early cancer detection, one specialist in urology, and two communication specialists) and by a different group of 21 co-workers from the same company (18 men and three women). The booklet addressed the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening.
The participants were not aware of the Brazilian Health Ministry recommendation against prostate cancer screening. The group discussed their doubts and perceptions regarding the theme. The final booklet, which became a publication by the José Alencar Gomes da Silva National Cancer Institute (INCA), was evaluated by participants and specialists.
The participation of men in the development and assessment of the material confirmed the pressing need to disseminate information regarding the risks and potential damage associated with prostate cancer screening. Educational materials should not be treated as independent items, but rather as complementary resources to be used as part of shared, critical, and creative educational initiatives.
描述前列腺癌教育手册的共同开发过程。
采用参与观察研究,选取了一个便利样本,最初包括16名同事(15名男性和1名女性),以收集开发教育材料所需的信息。初稿由8名专家(5名早期癌症检测专家、1名泌尿外科专家和2名沟通专家)以及来自同一家公司的另一组21名同事(18名男性和3名女性)进行评估。该手册阐述了前列腺癌筛查的风险和益处。
参与者并不知晓巴西卫生部反对前列腺癌筛查的建议。该小组讨论了他们对这一主题的疑问和看法。最终手册由若泽·阿伦卡尔·戈麦斯·达席尔瓦国家癌症研究所(INCA)出版,并由参与者和专家进行了评估。
男性参与材料的开发和评估证实了迫切需要传播有关前列腺癌筛查相关风险和潜在损害的信息。教育材料不应被视为独立的项目,而应作为共享、批判性和创造性教育举措一部分的补充资源。