Baragatti Daniella Yamada, Rolim Ana Carine Arruda, de Castro Cristiane Pereira, de Melo Márcio Cristiano, Silva Eliete Maria
Faculdade de Enfermagem (FENF/UNICAMP) Faculdade de Enfermagem (FENF/UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brasil Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Enfermagem (FENF/UNICAMP), Campinas (SP), Brasil.
Escola Multicampi de Ciências Médicas (EMCM/UFRN) Escola Multicampi de Ciências Médicas (EMCM/UFRN) Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte CaicóRN Brasil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Escola Multicampi de Ciências Médicas (EMCM/UFRN), Caicó (RN), Brasil.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019 Mar 27;43:e34. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2019.34. eCollection 2019.
To identify the critical pathway taken by women facing domestic violence in the world in their search for help.
An integrative review was performed. LILACS, MEDLINE/ PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until year 2017. The following were inclusion criteria: full text available online, Portuguese, Spanish, or English as language of publication, focus on the theme of interest, and answering the guiding question (Which critical path is taken by women facing domestic violence?).
Thirty-eight articles published from 2001 to 2017 were included. Factors driving the search for help included economic empowerment and increased schooling, severity of the violence, and presence of structured and qualified support services. Factors inhibiting the search for help were immigrant status, cultural gender norms, feelings of guilt, fear, and shame, lack of confidence and little knowledge and/or limited availability of formal support services. Children as well as family and community support may function as both inhibitors or drivers of the search for help. The types of formal help most often sought are police and health care services, whereas family, community, and religious leadership provide informal support.
The critical pathway of women facing domestic violence in the world includes both formal and informal elements. Therefore, it is necessary to address sociocultural, community, and family issues so as to encourage women to break free from the violent environment and seek qualified formal support networks.
确定全球遭受家庭暴力的女性寻求帮助的关键途径。
进行了一项综合综述。检索了LILACS、MEDLINE/ PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,截至2017年。纳入标准如下:在线提供全文,出版语言为葡萄牙语、西班牙语或英语,关注感兴趣的主题,并回答指导问题(遭受家庭暴力的女性采取了哪些关键途径?)。
纳入了2001年至2017年发表的38篇文章。促使寻求帮助的因素包括经济赋权、受教育程度提高、暴力的严重程度以及结构化和合格的支持服务的存在。阻碍寻求帮助的因素包括移民身份、文化性别规范、内疚感、恐惧和羞耻感、缺乏信心以及对正式支持服务的了解不足和/或可获得性有限。儿童以及家庭和社区支持可能既是寻求帮助的阻碍因素,也是驱动因素。最常寻求的正式帮助类型是警察和医疗服务,而家庭、社区和宗教领袖提供非正式支持。
全球遭受家庭暴力的女性的关键途径包括正式和非正式因素。因此,有必要解决社会文化、社区和家庭问题,以鼓励女性摆脱暴力环境,寻求合格的正式支持网络。