Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
J Physiol. 2019 Jul;597(14):3619-3638. doi: 10.1113/JP277827. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Early-afterdepolarizations (EADs) are abnormal action potential oscillations and a known cause of cardiac arrhythmias. Ventricular EADs involve reactivation of a Ca current (I ) in its 'window region' voltage range. However, electrical mechanisms of atrial EADs, a potential cause of atrial fibrillation, are poorly understood. Atrial cells were obtained from consenting patients undergoing heart surgery, as well as from rabbits. I was blocked with nifedipine and then a hybrid patch clamp/mathematical-modelling technique, 'dynamic clamping', was used to record action potentials at the same time as injecting an artificial, modifiable, I (I ). Progressively widening the I window region produced EADs of various types, dependent on window width. EAD production was strongest upon moving the activation (vs. inactivation) side of the window. EADs were then induced by a different method: increasing I amplitude and/or K channel-blockade (4-aminopyridine). Narrowing of the I window by ∼10 mV abolished these EADs. Atrial I window narrowing is worthy of further testing as a potential anti-atrial fibrillation drug mechanism.
Atrial early-afterdepolarizations (EADs) may contribute to atrial fibrillation (AF), perhaps involving reactivation of L-type Ca current (I ) in its window region voltage range. The present study aimed (i) to validate the dynamic clamp technique for modifying the I contribution to atrial action potential (AP) waveform; (ii) to investigate the effects of widening the window I on EAD-propensity; and (iii) to test whether EADs from increased I and AP duration are supressed by narrowing the window I . I and APs were recorded from rabbit and human atrial myocytes by whole-cell-patch clamp. During AP recording, I was inhibited (3 µm nifedipine) and replaced by a dynamic clamp model current, I (tuned to native I characteristics), computed in real-time (every 50 µs) based on myocyte membrane potential. I -injection restored the nifedipine-suppressed AP plateau. Widening the window I , symmetrically by stepwise simultaneous equal shifts of half-voltages (V ) of I activation (negatively) and inactivation (positively), generated EADs (single, multiple or preceding repolarization failure) in a window width-dependent manner, as well as AP alternans. A stronger EAD-generating effect resulted from independently shifting activation V (asymmetrical widening) than inactivation V ; for example, a 15 mV activation shift produced EADs in nine of 17 (53%) human atrial myocytes vs. 0 of 18 from inactivation shift (P < 0.05). In 11 rabbit atrial myocytes in which EADs were generated either by increasing the conductance of normal window width I or subsequent 4-aminopyridine (2 mm), window I narrowing (10 mV) abolished EADs of all types (P < 0.05). The present study validated the dynamic clamp for I , which is novel in atrial cardiomyocytes, and showed that EADs of various types are generated by widening (particularly asymmetrically) the window I , as well as abolished by narrowing it. Window I narrowing is a potential therapeutic mechanism worth pursuing in the search for improved anti-AF drugs.
早期后除极(EADs)是一种异常的动作电位震荡,是心律失常的已知原因。心室 EADs 涉及在其“窗口区域”电压范围内重新激活钙电流(I )。然而,心房 EADs 的电生理机制(心房颤动的潜在原因)了解甚少。从接受心脏手术的患者以及兔子中获得心房细胞。用硝苯地平阻断 I ,然后使用混合膜片钳/数学建模技术“动态钳位”,同时记录动作电位和注入人工可调节 I (I )。逐渐扩大 I 窗口区域产生了各种类型的 EADs,取决于窗口宽度。在移动窗口的激活(与失活相对)侧时,EAD 产生最强。然后通过不同的方法诱导 EAD:增加 I 幅度和/或 K 通道阻断(4-氨基吡啶)。将 I 窗口缩小约 10 mV 可消除这些 EADs。缩小心房 I 窗口值得进一步研究,作为一种潜在的抗心房颤动药物机制。
心房早期后除极(EADs)可能导致心房颤动(AF),可能涉及在其窗口区域电压范围内重新激活 L 型钙电流(I )。本研究旨在:(i)验证动态钳位技术对改变 I 对心房动作电位(AP)波形的贡献的有效性;(ii)研究扩大窗口 I 对 EAD 倾向的影响;(iii)测试增加 I 和 AP 持续时间的 EAD 是否被缩小窗口 I 抑制。通过全细胞膜片钳记录兔和人心房肌细胞的 I 和 AP。在 AP 记录过程中,用 3 µm 硝苯地平抑制 I ,并用实时计算的动态钳位模型电流 I (根据心肌细胞膜电位调整为天然 I 特性)代替。I 注入恢复了硝苯地平抑制的 AP 平台。I 窗口的对称逐步同时等距半电压(V )的加宽(I 的激活(负)和失活(正))以窗口宽度依赖的方式产生 EADs(单、多或复极化失败之前),以及 AP 交替。与失活 V 相比,独立移动激活 V (不对称加宽)产生更强的 EAD 生成效应;例如,15 mV 的激活移位在 17 个人心房肌细胞中的 9 个(53%)中产生 EADs,而失活移位中没有一个(0/18,P <0.05)。在 11 个兔心房肌细胞中,通过增加正常窗口宽度 I 的电导率或随后的 4-氨基吡啶(2 mM)产生 EADs,窗口 I 变窄(10 mV)消除了所有类型的 EADs(P <0.05)。本研究验证了用于 I 的动态钳位,这在心房肌细胞中是新颖的,并表明各种类型的 EADs是通过扩大(特别是不对称地)窗口 I 产生的,并且通过缩小它而消除。缩小窗口 I 是值得进一步研究的潜在治疗机制,以寻找更好的抗 AF 药物。