• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蹦跳训练与最佳力量负荷训练对青年男性足球运动员身体素质各成分的影响。

Effects of Plyometric Versus Optimum Power Load Training on Components of Physical Fitness in Young Male Soccer Players.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Feb 1;15(2):222-230. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0039. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2019-0039
PMID:31094261
Abstract

PURPOSE

The current study aimed to compare the effects of plyometric (PT) versus optimum power load (OPL) training on physical performance of young high-level soccer players.

METHODS

Athletes were randomly divided into PT (horizontal and vertical drills) and OPL (squat + hip thrust exercises at the load of maximum power output) interventions, applied over 7 weeks during the in-season period. Squat and countermovement jumps, maximal sprint (10 and 30 m), and change of direction (COD; agility t test) were the pretraining and posttraining measured performance variables. Magnitude-based inference was used for within- and between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

OPL training induced moderate improvements in vertical squat jump (effect size [ES]: 0.97; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.61) and countermovement jump (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.46-1.57), 30-m sprint speed (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.09-1.95), and COD performance (ES: 0.93; 90% CI, 0.50-1.36). After PT training method, vertical squat jump (ES: 1.08; 90% CI, 0.66-1.51) and countermovement jump (ES: 0.62; 90% CI, 0.18-1.06) were moderately increased, while small enhancements were noticed for 30-m sprint speed (ES: 0.21; 90% CI, -0.02 to 0.45) and COD performance (ES: 0.53; 90% CI, 0.24-0.81). The 10-m sprint speed possibly increased after PT intervention (small ES: 0.25; 90% CI, -0.05 to 0.54), but no substantial change (small ES: 0.36; 90% CI, -0.40 to 1.13) was noticed in OPL. For between-group analyses, the COD ability and 30-m sprint performances were possibly (small ES: 0.30; 90% CI, -0.20 to 0.81; Δ = +1.88%) and likely (moderate ES: 0.81; 90% CI, -0.16 to 1.78; Δ = +2.38%) more improved in the OPL than in the PT intervention, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2 different training programs improved physical performance outcomes during the in-season period. However, the combination of vertically and horizontally based training exercises (squat + hip thrust) at optimum power zone led to superior gains in COD and 30-m linear sprint performances.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较增强式训练(PT)与最佳功率负荷(OPL)训练对高水平青年足球运动员身体表现的影响。

方法

运动员被随机分为 PT(水平和垂直训练)和 OPL(深蹲+髋关节推力练习,负荷为最大输出功率)干预组,在赛季期间进行 7 周的干预。深蹲和纵跳、最大冲刺(10 米和 30 米)和变向能力(敏捷 T 测试)是训练前和训练后的测量表现变量。使用基于幅度的推理进行组内和组间比较。

结果

OPL 训练引起了垂直深蹲跳(效应量[ES]:0.97;90%置信区间[CI],0.32-1.61)和纵跳(ES:1.02;90% CI,0.46-1.57)、30 米冲刺速度(ES:1.02;90% CI,0.09-1.95)和变向能力(ES:0.93;90% CI,0.50-1.36)的中等改善。经过 PT 训练方法,垂直深蹲跳(ES:1.08;90% CI,0.66-1.51)和纵跳(ES:0.62;90% CI,0.18-1.06)中等增加,而 30 米冲刺速度(ES:0.21;90% CI,-0.02 至 0.45)和变向能力(ES:0.53;90% CI,0.24-0.81)则略有提高。PT 干预后 10 米冲刺速度可能有所提高(小 ES:0.25;90% CI,-0.05 至 0.54),但 OPL 中没有观察到实质性变化(小 ES:0.36;90% CI,-0.40 至 1.13)。对于组间分析,变向能力和 30 米冲刺表现可能(小 ES:0.30;90% CI,-0.20 至 0.81;Δ=+1.88%)和可能(中 ES:0.81;90% CI,-0.16 至 1.78;Δ=+2.38%)在 OPL 中比在 PT 干预中更有改善。

结论

在赛季期间,两种不同的训练方案均提高了身体表现结果。然而,在最佳功率区域结合垂直和水平训练练习(深蹲+髋关节推力)可导致变向能力和 30 米直线冲刺表现的更大提升。

相似文献

1
Effects of Plyometric Versus Optimum Power Load Training on Components of Physical Fitness in Young Male Soccer Players.蹦跳训练与最佳力量负荷训练对青年男性足球运动员身体素质各成分的影响。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Feb 1;15(2):222-230. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0039. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
2
The Increased Effectiveness of Loaded Versus Unloaded Plyometric Jump Training in Improving Muscle Power, Speed, Change of Direction, and Kicking-Distance Performance in Prepubertal Male Soccer Players.负荷与非负荷增强式跳跃训练对改善青春期前男性足球运动员肌肉力量、速度、变向能力和踢球距离的效果比较。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Feb 1;15(2):189–195. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0866. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Comparative Effects of In-Season Full-Back Squat, Resisted Sprint Training, and Plyometric Training on Explosive Performance in U-19 Elite Soccer Players.赛季内全蹲训练、抗阻冲刺训练和增强式训练对19岁以下精英足球运动员爆发力的比较影响
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Feb;30(2):368-77. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001094.
4
The Effect of Plyometric Training Volume on Athletic Performance in Prepubertal Male Soccer Players.弹跳训练量对青春期前男性足球运动员运动表现的影响。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Oct;12(9):1205-1211. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0372. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
Effects of Plyometric and Directional Training on Physical Fitness Parameters in Youth Soccer Players.弹跳和定向训练对青少年足球运动员身体素质参数的影响。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Mar 1;14(3):392-398. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0545. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Improving Sprint Performance in Soccer: Effectiveness of Jump Squat and Olympic Push Press Exercises.提高足球短跑表现:深蹲跳和奥运式俯卧撑练习的有效性。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153958. eCollection 2016.
7
Power training in elite young soccer players: Effects of using loads above or below the optimum power zone.精英年轻足球运动员的力量训练:使用高于或低于最佳力量区的负荷的效果。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Jun-Jun;38(11-12):1416-1422. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1651614. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
Effects of Different Plyometric Training Frequencies on Measures of Athletic Performance in Prepuberal Male Soccer Players.不同增强式训练频率对青春期前男性足球运动员运动表现测量指标的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jun;34(6):1609-1617. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002486.
9
The Effects of a 6-Week Plyometric and Sprint Interval Training Intervention on Soccer Player's Physical Performance.6 周增强式训练和冲刺间歇训练对足球运动员身体性能的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Sep 1;23(1):526-536. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.526. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Effectiveness and time-course adaptation of resistance training vs. plyometric training in prepubertal soccer players.抗阻训练与 plyometric 训练对青春期前足球运动员的效果和时程适应性比较。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Dec;9(6):620-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Strength and Power Capacities in Elite Male Soccer: A Systematic Review of Test Protocols Used in Practice and Research.评估精英男性足球运动员的力量和功率能力:实践和研究中使用的测试方案的系统评价。
Sports Med. 2024 Oct;54(10):2607-2644. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02071-8. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Resistance Training Practices of Brazilian Olympic Sprint and Jump Coaches: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Their Choices and Insights (Part III).巴西奥运会短跑和跳远教练的阻力训练实践:深入了解他们的选择与见解(第三部分)
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Feb 2;90:183-214. doi: 10.5114/jhk/182888. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Strength and Conditioning Practices of Brazilian Olympic Sprint and Jump Coaches.
巴西奥运会短跑和跳远教练的体能训练方法
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jan 20;86:175-194. doi: 10.5114/jhk/159646. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Effect of 4 weeks of plyometric training in the pre-competitive period on volleyball athletes' performance.赛前4周的增强式训练对排球运动员成绩的影响。
Biol Sport. 2023 Jan;40(1):193-200. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.112971. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
Effects of Resistance Training With Constant, Inertial, and Combined Loads on Muscle Power and Strength Output.恒定负荷、惯性负荷及联合负荷抗阻训练对肌肉力量和力量输出的影响。
Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 25;12:709263. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.709263. eCollection 2021.
6
Traditional Versus Velocity-Based Resistance Training in Competitive Female Cyclists: A Randomized Controlled Trial.竞技女性自行车运动员的传统训练与基于速度的阻力训练:一项随机对照试验
Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 25;12:586113. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.586113. eCollection 2021.
7
Unilateral Plyometric Training is Superior to Volume-Matched Bilateral Training for Improving Strength, Speed and Power of Lower Limbs in Preadolescent Soccer Athletes.单侧增强式训练在提高青春期前足球运动员下肢力量、速度和爆发力方面优于等运动量的双侧训练。
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Aug 31;74:161-176. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0022. eCollection 2020 Aug.