Suppr超能文献

赛季内全蹲训练、抗阻冲刺训练和增强式训练对19岁以下精英足球运动员爆发力的比较影响

Comparative Effects of In-Season Full-Back Squat, Resisted Sprint Training, and Plyometric Training on Explosive Performance in U-19 Elite Soccer Players.

作者信息

de Hoyo Moises, Gonzalo-Skok Oliver, Sañudo Borja, Carrascal Claudio, Plaza-Armas Jose R, Camacho-Candil Fernando, Otero-Esquina Carlos

机构信息

1Fitness Section, Sevilla Football Club, Seville, Spain; 2Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Seville, Seville, Spain; 3Faculty of Health Sciences, University of San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain; 4Center for Andalusian Football Studies, Development, and Research, Seville, Spain; and 5Fitness Section, Nervion Football Club, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Feb;30(2):368-77. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001094.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of 3 different low/moderate load strength training methods (full-back squat [SQ], resisted sprint with sled towing [RS], and plyometric and specific drills training [PLYO]) on sprinting, jumping, and change of direction (COD) abilities in soccer players. Thirty-two young elite male Spanish soccer players participated in the study. Subjects performed 2 specific strength training sessions per week, in addition to their normal training sessions for 8 weeks. The full-back squat protocol consisted of 2-3 sets × 4-8 repetitions at 40-60% 1 repetition maximum (∼ 1.28-0.98 m · s(-1)). The resisted sprint training was compounded by 6-10 sets × 20-m loaded sprints (12.6% of body mass). The plyometric and specific drills training was based on 1-3 sets × 2-3 repetitions of 8 plyometric and speed/agility exercises. Testing sessions included a countermovement jump (CMJ), a 20-m sprint (10-m split time), a 50-m (30-m split time) sprint, and COD test (i.e., Zig-Zag test). Substantial improvements (likely to almost certainly) in CMJ (effect size [ES]: 0.50-0.57) and 30-50 m (ES: 0.45-0.84) were found in every group in comparison to pretest results. Moreover, players in PLYO and SQ groups also showed substantial enhancements (likely to very likely) in 0-50 m (ES: 0.46-0.60). In addition, 10-20 m was also improved (very likely) in the SQ group (ES: 0.61). Between-group analyses showed that improvements in 10-20 m (ES: 0.57) and 30-50 m (ES: 0.40) were likely greater in the SQ group than in the RS group. Also, 10-20 m (ES: 0.49) was substantially better in the SQ group than in the PLYO group. In conclusion, the present strength training methods used in this study seem to be effective to improve jumping and sprinting abilities, but COD might need other stimulus to achieve positive effects.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析3种不同的低/中等负荷力量训练方法(全蹲 [SQ]、雪橇牵引抗阻冲刺跑 [RS] 以及增强式和专项训练 [PLYO])对足球运动员冲刺跑、跳跃和变向(COD)能力的影响。32名年轻的西班牙精英男性足球运动员参与了本研究。受试者除了进行8周的常规训练外,每周还进行2次特定的力量训练。全蹲训练方案包括以40 - 60%的1次最大重复量(~1.28 - 0.98米·秒⁻¹)进行2 - 3组×4 - 8次重复。抗阻冲刺跑训练包括6 - 10组×20米负重冲刺跑(体重的12.6%)。增强式和专项训练基于8项增强式和速度/敏捷性练习,进行1 - 3组×2 - 3次重复。测试项目包括纵跳(CMJ)、20米冲刺跑(10米分段时间)、50米(30米分段时间)冲刺跑以及COD测试(即Z字跑测试)。与测试前结果相比,每组的纵跳(效应量 [ES]:0.50 - 0.57)和30 - 50米(ES:0.45 - 0.84)均有显著提高(可能几乎可以肯定)。此外,PLYO组和SQ组的运动员在0 - 50米(ES:0.46 - 0.60)方面也有显著提升(可能非常可能)。另外,SQ组在10 - 20米方面也有改善(非常可能)(ES:0.61)。组间分析表明,SQ组在10 - 20米(ES:0.57)和30 - 50米(ES:0.40)方面的改善可能比RS组更大。此外,SQ组在10 - 20米(ES:0.49)方面比PLYO组显著更好。总之,本研究中使用的当前力量训练方法似乎对提高跳跃和冲刺跑能力有效,但COD能力可能需要其他刺激才能产生积极效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验