• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强的默认模式连接可预测创伤性脑损伤的元认知准确性。

Enhanced default mode connectivity predicts metacognitive accuracy in traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Social, Life, and Engineering Imaging Center (SLEIC).

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2019 Oct;33(7):922-933. doi: 10.1037/neu0000559. Epub 2019 May 16.

DOI:10.1037/neu0000559
PMID:31094553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6763355/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the role that intrinsic functional networks, specifically the default mode network, have on metacognitive accuracy for individuals with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHOD

A sample of 44 individuals (TBI, n = 21; healthy controls [HCs], n = 23) were included in the study. All participants underwent an MRI scan and completed neuropsychological testing. Metacognitive accuracy was defined as participants' ability to correctly judge their item-by-item performance on an abstract reasoning task. Metacognitive values were calculated using the signal detection theory approach of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Large-scale subnetworks were created using Power's 264 Functional Atlas. The graph theory metric of network strength was calculated for six subsystem networks to measure functional connectivity.

RESULTS

There were significant interactions between head injury status (TBI or HC) and internetwork connectivity between the anterior default mode network (DMN) and salience network on metacognitive accuracy (R2 = 0.13, p = .047) and between the posterior DMN and salience network on metacognitive accuracy (R2 = 0.15, p = .038). There was an interpretable interaction between head injury status and internetwork connectivity between the attention network and salience network on metacognitive accuracy (R2 = 0.13, p = .067). In all interactions, higher connectivity predicted better metacognitive accuracy in the TBI group, but this relationship was reversed for the HC group.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced connectivity to both anterior and posterior regions within the DMN facilitates metacognitive accuracy postinjury. These findings are integrated into a larger literature examining network plasticity in TBI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

探讨固有功能网络(尤其是默认模式网络)对中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)个体元认知准确性的作用。

方法

本研究纳入了 44 名个体(TBI 组,n=21;健康对照组[HCs],n=23)。所有参与者均接受 MRI 扫描和神经心理学测试。元认知准确性定义为参与者正确判断其在抽象推理任务中逐项表现的能力。使用受试者工作特征曲线下的信号检测理论方法计算元认知值。使用 Power 的 264 功能图谱创建大规模子网。计算六个子系统网络的网络强度图论度量,以测量功能连接。

结果

在元认知准确性方面,头部损伤状态(TBI 或 HCs)与前默认模式网络(DMN)和突显网络之间的网络间连通性之间存在显著的交互作用(R2=0.13,p=0.047),以及在后 DMN 和突显网络之间的网络间连通性(R2=0.15,p=0.038)。头部损伤状态和注意网络与突显网络之间的网络间连通性与元认知准确性之间存在可解释的交互作用(R2=0.13,p=0.067)。在所有交互作用中,较高的连通性预测 TBI 组的元认知准确性更高,但对 HCs 组则相反。

结论

DMN 中前后区域的连通性增强有助于受伤后元认知的准确性。这些发现被纳入了一个更大的文献综述,其中包括 TBI 中网络可塑性的研究。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/a5e4ad9454a6/nihms-1031123-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/491e96d5cb4b/nihms-1031123-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/57cc6822af5e/nihms-1031123-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/72fc0bb5f0a9/nihms-1031123-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/eadb9e445d8e/nihms-1031123-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/e719bb030810/nihms-1031123-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/a5e4ad9454a6/nihms-1031123-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/491e96d5cb4b/nihms-1031123-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/57cc6822af5e/nihms-1031123-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/72fc0bb5f0a9/nihms-1031123-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/eadb9e445d8e/nihms-1031123-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/e719bb030810/nihms-1031123-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710a/6763355/a5e4ad9454a6/nihms-1031123-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhanced default mode connectivity predicts metacognitive accuracy in traumatic brain injury.增强的默认模式连接可预测创伤性脑损伤的元认知准确性。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Oct;33(7):922-933. doi: 10.1037/neu0000559. Epub 2019 May 16.
2
Prefrontal gray matter volume predicts metacognitive accuracy following traumatic brain injury.前额叶灰质体积预测创伤性脑损伤后的元认知准确性。
Neuropsychology. 2018 May;32(4):484-494. doi: 10.1037/neu0000446.
3
Disrupted Intrinsic Connectivity among Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks in Individuals with Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury.慢性创伤性脑损伤患者默认网络、背侧注意网络和额顶叶控制网络之间的内在连接中断。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Feb;22(2):263-79. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715001393.
4
Metacognitive accuracy predicts self-reported quality of life following traumatic brain injury.元认知准确性可预测创伤性脑损伤后的自我报告生活质量。
Brain Inj. 2024 Apr 15;38(5):361-367. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2311336. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
5
Abnormal connectivity in the sensorimotor network predicts attention deficits in traumatic brain injury.感觉运动网络中的异常连接可预测创伤性脑损伤中的注意力缺陷。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4841-z. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
6
Functional connectivity within lateral posterior parietal cortex in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤患者外侧后顶叶皮层的功能连接。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Sep;33(6):893-910. doi: 10.1037/neu0000553. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
7
Disruption of periaqueductal grey-default mode network functional connectivity predicts persistent post-traumatic headache in mild traumatic brain injury.中脑导水管周围灰质-默认模式网络功能连接中断可预测轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续性创伤后头痛。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;90(3):326-332. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318886. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Disconnection between the default mode network and medial temporal lobes in post-traumatic amnesia.创伤后遗忘症中默认模式网络与内侧颞叶之间的脱节。
Brain. 2016 Dec;139(Pt 12):3137-3150. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww241. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
9
Resting-State Network Plasticity Induced by Music Therapy after Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后音乐治疗诱导的静息态网络可塑性。
Neural Plast. 2021 Mar 8;2021:6682471. doi: 10.1155/2021/6682471. eCollection 2021.
10
Damage to the Salience Network and interactions with the Default Mode Network.突显网络的损伤以及与默认模式网络的相互作用。
J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 13;34(33):10798-807. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0518-14.2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Meso-scale network analysis of resting state-fMRI brain network connectivity performs poorly as a prognostic tool in critically ill traumatic brain injury patients.作为重症创伤性脑损伤患者的预后工具,静息态功能磁共振成像脑网络连通性的中尺度网络分析表现不佳。
Neuroimage Rep. 2022 Jan 10;2(1):100079. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100079. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Functional connectivity and white matter microstructural alterations in patients with left basal ganglia acute ischemic stroke.左侧基底节区急性缺血性脑卒中患者的功能连接和白质微结构改变
Brain Imaging Behav. 2025 Apr;19(2):421-432. doi: 10.1007/s11682-025-00982-2. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Graph theory approaches to functional network organization in brain disorders: A critique for a brave new small-world.大脑疾病中功能网络组织的图论方法:对一个勇敢的新小世界的批判。
Netw Neurosci. 2018 Oct 1;3(1):1-26. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00054. eCollection 2019.
2
Prefrontal gray matter volume predicts metacognitive accuracy following traumatic brain injury.前额叶灰质体积预测创伤性脑损伤后的元认知准确性。
Neuropsychology. 2018 May;32(4):484-494. doi: 10.1037/neu0000446.
3
Dedifferentiation Does Not Account for Hyperconnectivity after Traumatic Brain Injury.
Drivers of resting-state fMRI heterogeneity in traumatic brain injury across injury characteristics and imaging methods: a systematic review and semiquantitative analysis.
创伤性脑损伤中静息态功能磁共振成像异质性的驱动因素:跨损伤特征和成像方法的系统评价与半定量分析
Front Neurol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1487796. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1487796. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluating post-thrombectomy effective connectivity changes in anterior circulation stroke.评估血栓切除术后前循环卒中患者的有效连接性变化。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Dec;11(12):3152-3162. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52221. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
5
Verbal Learning and Memory Deficits across Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Insights from an ENIGMA Mega Analysis.神经系统疾病和神经精神疾病中的言语学习与记忆缺陷:ENIGMA大型分析的见解
Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 29;14(7):669. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070669.
6
Bayesian varying-effects vector autoregressive models for inference of brain connectivity networks and covariate effects in pediatric traumatic brain injury.贝叶斯变系数向量自回归模型在儿科创伤性脑损伤中脑连接网络和协变量效应推断中的应用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jul 15;45(10):e26763. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26763.
7
ENIGMA's simple seven: Recommendations to enhance the reproducibility of resting-state fMRI in traumatic brain injury.ENIGMA 简单七原则:提高创伤性脑损伤静息态 fMRI 可重复性的建议。
Neuroimage Clin. 2024;42:103585. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103585. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
8
Neural Correlates of Impaired Self-awareness of Deficits after Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.后天性脑损伤后自我缺陷意识受损的神经相关性:系统综述。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Mar;33(1):222-237. doi: 10.1007/s11065-022-09535-6. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
9
A Framework to Advance Biomarker Development in the Diagnosis, Outcome Prediction, and Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury.推进生物标志物在创伤性脑损伤的诊断、预后预测和治疗中的发展的框架。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Apr;39(7-8):436-457. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0099. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
10
Integrative Neuroinformatics for Precision Prognostication and Personalized Therapeutics in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.用于中重度创伤性脑损伤精准预后评估和个性化治疗的整合神经信息学
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 7;12:729184. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.729184. eCollection 2021.
去分化不能解释创伤性脑损伤后的高连接性。
Front Neurol. 2017 Jul 17;8:297. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00297. eCollection 2017.
4
The evolution of cost-efficiency in neural networks during recovery from traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤恢复过程中神经网络成本效率的演变
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0170541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170541. eCollection 2017.
5
Injured Brains and Adaptive Networks: The Benefits and Costs of Hyperconnectivity.受伤的大脑与适应的网络:超连接的好处与代价。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 May;21(5):385-401. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
6
Mapping the functional connectome in traumatic brain injury: What can graph metrics tell us?创伤性脑损伤的功能连接组学图谱:图论指标能告诉我们什么?
Neuroimage. 2017 Oct 15;160:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
7
Recovery of episodic memory subprocesses in mild and complicated mild traumatic brain injury at 1 and 12 months post injury.轻度和复杂性轻度创伤性脑损伤患者在受伤后1个月和12个月时情景记忆子过程的恢复情况。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Nov;38(9):1005-14. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1182968. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
Substrates of metacognition on perception and metacognition on higher-order cognition relate to different subsystems of the mentalizing network.关于感知的元认知底物与关于高阶认知的元认知底物与心理化网络的不同子系统相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Oct;37(10):3388-99. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23247. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
An Evolutionary Computation Approach to Examine Functional Brain Plasticity.一种用于研究大脑功能可塑性的进化计算方法。
Front Neurosci. 2016 Apr 5;10:146. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00146. eCollection 2016.
10
Neural networks underlying the metacognitive uncertainty response.构成元认知不确定性反应基础的神经网络。
Cortex. 2015 Oct;71:306-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Aug 1.