Paul Erick J, Smith J David, Valentin Vivian V, Turner Benjamin O, Barbey Aron K, Ashby F Gregory
The Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, The University at Buffalo, State University of New York, USA.
Cortex. 2015 Oct;71:306-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
Humans monitor states of uncertainty that can guide decision-making. These uncertain states are evident behaviorally when humans decline to make a categorization response. Such behavioral uncertainty responses (URs) have also defined the search for metacognition in animals. While a plethora of neuroimaging studies have focused on uncertainty, the brain systems supporting a volitional strategy shift under uncertainty have not been distinguished from those observed in making introspective post-hoc reports of categorization uncertainty. Using rapid event-related fMRI, we demonstrate that the neural activity patterns elicited by humans' URs are qualitatively different from those recruited by associative processes during categorization. Participants performed a one-dimensional perceptual-categorization task in which an uncertainty-response option let them decline to make a categorization response. Uncertainty responding activated a distributed network including prefrontal cortex (PFC), anterior and posterior cingulate cortex (ACC, PCC), anterior insula, and posterior parietal areas; importantly, these regions were distinct from those whose activity was modulated by task difficulty. Generally, our results can be characterized as a large-scale cognitive control network including recently evolved brain regions such as the anterior dorsolateral and medial PFC. A metacognitive theory would view the UR as a deliberate behavioral adjustment rather than just a learned middle category response, and predicts this pattern of results. These neuroimaging results bolster previous behavioral findings, which suggested that different cognitive processes underlie responses due to associative learning versus the declaration of uncertainty. We conclude that the UR represents an elemental behavioral index of metacognition.
人类会监测那些能够指导决策的不确定状态。当人类拒绝做出分类反应时,这些不确定状态在行为上就很明显。这种行为上的不确定性反应(URs)也为在动物身上寻找元认知提供了依据。虽然大量的神经影像学研究都聚焦于不确定性,但在不确定性情况下支持自愿策略转变的大脑系统尚未与在对分类不确定性进行事后内省报告时所观察到的系统区分开来。通过快速事件相关功能磁共振成像,我们证明人类的URs引发的神经活动模式在性质上不同于分类过程中联想过程所招募的模式。参与者执行了一项一维感知分类任务,其中一个不确定性反应选项让他们可以拒绝做出分类反应。不确定性反应激活了一个分布式网络,包括前额叶皮层(PFC)、前扣带回和后扣带回皮层(ACC、PCC)、前脑岛和顶叶后部区域;重要的是,这些区域与那些其活动受任务难度调节的区域不同。一般来说,我们的结果可以被描述为一个大规模认知控制网络,包括最近进化的脑区,如前额叶背外侧和内侧PFC。一个元认知理论会将UR视为一种刻意的行为调整,而不仅仅是一种习得的中间类别反应,并预测了这种结果模式。这些神经影像学结果支持了先前的行为学发现,即联想学习与不确定性声明所导致的反应背后存在不同的认知过程。我们得出结论,UR代表了元认知的一个基本行为指标。