Schonhaut B Luisa
Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2019 Apr;90(2):217-221. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i2.1034.
Editorial Boards of mainstream journals occasionally face ethical misconducts in received manus cripts. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides recommendations for editors on how to deal with suspected ethical misconduct in either received or published manuscripts. The manus cript is rejected when malpractice is observed during the peer review process, however, if the mis conduct is detected after the publication, the publication will be retracted. The Revista Chilena de Pediatría (Chilean Journal of Pediatrics) has not been exempt from these type of conflicts. In this article, we analyze different aspects regarding the lack of integrity in publications, such as authorship, plagiarism, and conflict of interest. We can conclude that malpractices take place mainly due to the lack of knowledge of the authors rather than intent to defraud. It is expected that this article will suc ceed in instructing and sensitizing our researchers on good practices in research and publication, and contribute, as far as possible, to prevent this actions in the manuscripts sent to our Journal.
主流期刊的编辑委员会偶尔会在收到的稿件中面临道德失范行为。出版伦理委员会(COPE)为编辑提供了关于如何处理收到的或已发表稿件中疑似道德失范行为的建议。如果在同行评审过程中发现不当行为,稿件将被拒稿;然而,如果在发表后发现不当行为,该出版物将被撤回。《智利儿科学杂志》(Revista Chilena de Pediatría)也未能幸免这类冲突。在本文中,我们分析了出版物中缺乏诚信的不同方面,如作者身份、抄袭和利益冲突。我们可以得出结论,不当行为主要是由于作者缺乏知识,而非欺诈意图。期望本文能够成功指导并提高我们的研究人员对研究和出版良好实践的认识,并尽可能有助于防止提交给我们期刊的稿件中出现此类行为。