Department of Orthopedics, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 16;14(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1175-0.
In comparison to static spacers, articulating spacers have been shown to result in a similar infection eradication rate in two-stage revision of periprosthetic knee infections. However, the optimal construct for articulating spacers has not been identified yet. The aim of this study was to present a preliminary result of treatment for periprosthetic knee infection using a novel computer-aided design (CAD)-articulating spacer.
We retrospectively reviewed 32 consecutive cases of chronic periprosthetic knee infection occurring from January 2015 to December 2015. In these cases, we used an antibiotic-loaded, optimized CAD-articulating spacer based on the retrieved knee prosthesis. Evaluation included infection eradication rate, the Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, range of motion (ROM), and spacer-related mechanical complications. All cases were regularly followed-up for 2 years minimum.
Twenty-eight of 32 patients (87.5%) had infection eradication; 18 patients (56.3%) received reimplantation successfully. The mean interval between spacer insertion and reimplantation was 8.8 months (range 4.0-12.5 months). The mean HSS knee score and ROM significantly increased during each interval (p < 0.0001 for both). The mean HSS knee scores were 31.2 (range 20-48) at initial visit, 65.4 (range 60-78.8) at 1 month after spacer insertion, and 84.2 (range 78-90) at 3 months after reimplantation (p < 0.0001). The mean ROM were 72.0° (range 15-100°), 85.6° (range 35-110°), and 102.0° (range 80-122°), respectively (p = 0.002). Two (6.3%) spacer-related mechanical complications occurred.
The CAD-articulating spacer in two-staged revision of periprosthetic knee infection significantly controlled infection, improved clinical outcomes, increased ROM, and decreased mechanical complications in the preliminary study. Further larger clinical studies are needed to confirm the findings presented here.
与静态间隔器相比,在二期翻修假体周围膝关节感染中,关节活动间隔器已被证明具有相似的感染清除率。然而,关节活动间隔器的最佳结构尚未确定。本研究旨在介绍一种使用新型计算机辅助设计(CAD)关节活动间隔器治疗假体周围膝关节感染的初步结果。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月连续 32 例慢性假体周围膝关节感染患者。在这些病例中,我们使用了一种基于取出的膝关节假体的载抗生素、优化的 CAD 关节活动间隔器。评估包括感染清除率、特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分、活动范围(ROM)和间隔器相关机械并发症。所有病例均定期随访至少 2 年。
32 例患者中有 28 例(87.5%)感染清除;18 例(56.3%)患者成功接受再植入。间隔器插入和再植入之间的平均间隔为 8.8 个月(范围为 4.0-12.5 个月)。HSS 膝关节评分和 ROM 在每个间隔期均显著增加(p<0.0001)。初次就诊时 HSS 膝关节评分的平均值为 31.2(范围为 20-48),间隔器插入后 1 个月为 65.4(范围为 60-78.8),再植入后 3 个月为 84.2(范围为 78-90)(p<0.0001)。ROM 的平均值分别为 72.0°(范围为 15-100°)、85.6°(范围为 35-110°)和 102.0°(范围为 80-122°)(p=0.002)。发生了 2 例(6.3%)与间隔器相关的机械并发症。
在假体周围膝关节感染的二期翻修中,CAD 关节活动间隔器显著控制了感染,改善了临床结果,增加了 ROM,降低了机械并发症,初步研究结果令人满意。需要进一步的大型临床研究来证实这里提出的发现。