Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 40, 00032, Työterveyslaitos, Finland.
The Finnish Association On Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Viljatie 4 A, 007004, Helsinki, Finland.
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Dec;29(4):773-802. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09837-2.
Purpose This systematic review analyzed the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on the employment and functioning of people with intellectual disabilities (ID), as well as barriers and facilitators of employment. Methods This was a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. The outcomes were employment, transition to the open labor market and functioning. The review included qualitative studies of employment barriers and facilitators. The population comprised people with ID aged 16-68 years. Peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 1990 and February 2019 were obtained from the databases Cinahl, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Eric, Medic, Medline, OTseeker, Pedro, PsycInfo, PubMed, Socindex, and the Web of Science. We also searched Google Scholar and Base. The modified selection instrument (PIOS: participants, intervention, outcome, and study design) used in the selection of the articles depended on the selection criteria. Results Ten quantitative (one randomized controlled, one concurrently controlled, and eight cohort studies), six qualitative studies, one multimethod study, and 21 case studies met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative studies showed that secondary education increases employment among people with ID when it includes work experience and personal support services. Supported employment also increased employment in the open labor market, which sheltered work did not. The barriers to employment were the use of sheltered work, discrimination in vocational experience, the use of class teaching, and deficient work experience while still at school. The facilitators of employment were one's own activity, the support of one's family, job coaching, a well-designed work environment, appreciation of one's work, support form one's employer and work organization, knowledge and experience of employment during secondary education, and for entrepreneurs, the use of a support person. Conclusions The employment of people with ID can be improved through secondary education including proper teaching methods and personal support services, the use of supported work, workplace accommodations and support from one's family and employer. These results can be utilized in the development of rehabilitation, education, and the employment of people with ID, to allow them the opportunity to work in the open labor market and participate in society.
目的 本系统评价分析了康复干预措施对智力障碍(ID)患者就业和功能的有效性,以及就业的障碍和促进因素。
方法 这是一项对定量、定性和混合方法研究的系统评价。结果为就业、向开放劳动力市场过渡和功能。该综述包括就业障碍和促进因素的定性研究。研究人群为年龄在 16-68 岁的 ID 患者。从 Cinahl、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Eric、Medic、Medline、OTseeker、Pedro、PsycInfo、PubMed、Socindex 和 Web of Science 等数据库中获取了 1990 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月期间发表的英文同行评审文章。我们还在 Google Scholar 和 Base 上进行了搜索。用于文章选择的改良选择工具(PIOS:参与者、干预、结果和研究设计)取决于选择标准。
结果 10 项定量研究(1 项随机对照、1 项同期对照和 8 项队列研究)、6 项定性研究、1 项多方法研究和 21 项案例研究符合纳入标准。定量研究表明,当中学教育包括工作经验和个人支持服务时,它会增加 ID 人群的就业机会。支持性就业也增加了在开放劳动力市场的就业机会,而庇护性工作则没有。就业障碍包括使用庇护性工作、职业经历中的歧视、使用课堂教学以及在校期间工作经验不足。就业促进因素包括个人活动、家庭支持、工作辅导、精心设计的工作环境、对工作的欣赏、雇主和工作组织的支持、中学教育期间的就业知识和经验、以及对于企业家而言,使用支持人员。
结论 通过中学教育包括适当的教学方法和个人支持服务、使用支持性工作、工作场所适应和来自家庭和雇主的支持,可以提高 ID 人群的就业机会。这些结果可用于制定康复、教育和 ID 人群就业的规划,使他们有机会在开放劳动力市场工作并参与社会生活。