Lai Hong, Leng San-Hua, Yang Guan-Hu, Jiang Song-He, Lin Dan-Hong, Li Xiao-Dong
College of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of TCM, Fuzhou 350122, China; LAI Acupuncture, New York 11001, U.S.A.
Talented Hands Physical Therapy & Acupuncture, New York 11554; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang Province; Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM, Wuhan 430061.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2019 May 12;39(5):545-8. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2019.05.023.
To explore the positioning of acupoints, a research was done with PubMed for system reviews and clinical trials on treatment of low-back pain with sham-acupuncture controlled design from January 1, 2010 to October 27, 2017. Six system reviews and 12 sham-controlled acupuncture random trials were found. The statistical difference was not found in all the 6 trials with standard acupoint compared with the sham-acupuncture among the 8 penetrating skin sham-control trials. The statistical difference was found in the two trials with penetrating skin sham control, who was used individualized treatment, twirling for arrival or palpation for point. It is considered that sham-acupuncture penetrating skin is not a placebo, and needling with standard or dynamic acupoint may reduce low-back pain, and dynamic acupoint positioning may be better than standard acupoint positioning.
为探索穴位定位,检索了PubMed数据库,以查找2010年1月1日至2017年10月27日期间采用假针刺对照设计治疗腰痛的系统评价和临床试验。共找到6篇系统评价和12项假针刺对照的针灸随机试验。在8项穿透皮肤假对照试验中,与假针刺相比,所有6项使用标准穴位的试验均未发现统计学差异。在两项采用穿透皮肤假对照且使用个体化治疗、捻转进针或按穴的试验中发现了统计学差异。认为穿透皮肤假针刺并非安慰剂,采用标准或动态穴位针刺可能减轻腰痛,且动态穴位定位可能优于标准穴位定位。