• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

形态学的统计模型预测了在视觉单词识别过程中的眼动追踪测量。

Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.

机构信息

Center for Multilingualism in Society Across the Lifespan, Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Psychology, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1245-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00931-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-019-00931-7
PMID:31102191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6800854/
Abstract

We studied how statistical models of morphology that are built on different kinds of representational units, i.e., models emphasizing either holistic units or decomposition, perform in predicting human word recognition. More specifically, we studied the predictive power of such models at early vs. late stages of word recognition by using eye-tracking during two tasks. The tasks included a standard lexical decision task and a word recognition task that assumedly places less emphasis on postlexical reanalysis and decision processes. The lexical decision results showed good performance of Morfessor models based on the Minimum Description Length optimization principle. Models which segment words at some morpheme boundaries and keep other boundaries unsegmented performed well both at early and late stages of word recognition, supporting dual- or multiple-route cognitive models of morphological processing. Statistical models based on full forms fared better in late than early measures. The results of the second, multi-word recognition task showed that early and late stages of processing often involve accessing morphological constituents, with the exception of short complex words. Late stages of word recognition additionally involve predicting upcoming morphemes on the basis of previous ones in multimorphemic words. The statistical models based fully on whole words did not fare well in this task. Thus, we assume that the good performance of such models in global measures such as gaze durations or reaction times in lexical decision largely stems from postlexical reanalysis or decision processes. This finding highlights the importance of considering task demands in the study of morphological processing.

摘要

我们研究了基于不同表示单位的形态学统计模型在预测人类单词识别方面的表现,这些模型强调整体单位或分解。更具体地说,我们通过在两个任务中使用眼动追踪来研究这些模型在单词识别的早期和晚期阶段的预测能力。这些任务包括标准的词汇判断任务和一个假设较少依赖词后再分析和决策过程的单词识别任务。词汇判断结果显示,基于最小描述长度优化原则的 Morfessor 模型表现良好。在一些词素边界上分段而在其他边界上不分段的模型在单词识别的早期和晚期阶段都表现良好,支持形态处理的双重或多重认知模型。基于完整形式的统计模型在晚期测量中表现优于早期测量。第二个多词识别任务的结果表明,处理的早期和晚期阶段通常涉及访问形态成分,除了短的复杂词。在多词素词中,单词识别的晚期阶段还涉及根据前一个词素预测即将到来的词素。完全基于整个词的统计模型在这项任务中表现不佳。因此,我们假设这些模型在词汇判断中的全局测量(如注视持续时间或反应时间)中的良好表现主要源于词后再分析或决策过程。这一发现强调了在形态处理研究中考虑任务需求的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/c55fc0581672/13421_2019_931_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/2feb7e56009f/13421_2019_931_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/f4b789e4e3cc/13421_2019_931_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/639567f2cefc/13421_2019_931_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/c55fc0581672/13421_2019_931_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/2feb7e56009f/13421_2019_931_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/f4b789e4e3cc/13421_2019_931_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/639567f2cefc/13421_2019_931_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ced/6800854/c55fc0581672/13421_2019_931_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.形态学的统计模型预测了在视觉单词识别过程中的眼动追踪测量。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1245-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00931-7.
2
Using Statistical Models of Morphology in the Search for Optimal Units of Representation in the Human Mental Lexicon.利用形态学统计模型探寻人类心理词典中最优的表征单元
Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):939-973. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12576. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
3
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.幸存的盲目分解:复杂单词识别时间进程的分布分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
4
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
5
Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.阿拉伯语中的正字法和词频效应:来自眼动和词汇判断的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):934-954. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000626. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.命名和词汇判断中视觉单词识别的注意力资源需求。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 May;18(2):460-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.460.
7
Information properties of morphologically complex words modulate brain activity during word reading.形态复杂词的信息属性在单词阅读过程中调节大脑活动。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jun;39(6):2583-2595. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
8
A paradox of apparent brainless behavior: The time-course of compound word recognition.一个明显无脑行为的悖论:复合词识别的时程。
Cortex. 2019 Jul;116:250-267. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.功能词和实词的词汇加工与文本整合:来自启动效应和眼动注视的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Oct;28(7):1098-108. doi: 10.3758/bf03211811.
10
Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.比较命名、词汇判断和眼动注视时间:词频效应与个体差异。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Nov;26(6):1270-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03201199.

引用本文的文献

1
Subword Representations Successfully Decode Brain Responses to Morphologically Complex Written Words.子词表征成功解码大脑对形态复杂书面单词的反应。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Sep 11;5(4):844-863. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00149. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Statistical Models of Morphology in the Search for Optimal Units of Representation in the Human Mental Lexicon.利用形态学统计模型探寻人类心理词典中最优的表征单元
Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):939-973. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12576. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition.分解、查找与重组:复杂视觉单词识别完整分解模型的脑磁图证据
Brain Lang. 2015 Apr;143:81-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
The role of morphology in phoneme prediction: evidence from MEG.
形态学在音素预测中的作用:来自脑磁图的证据。
Brain Lang. 2014 Feb;129:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.004. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
Connectionism and the Role of Morphology in Visual Word Recognition.联结主义与词法在视觉单词识别中的作用
Ment Lex. 2010 Jan 1;5(3):371-400. doi: 10.1075/ml.5.3.07rue.
5
Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words.形态复杂词听觉理解中的概率与惊讶度。
Cognition. 2012 Oct;125(1):80-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
6
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.基于朴素判别学习的视觉理解中形态处理的无定形模型。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;118(3):438-481. doi: 10.1037/a0023851.
8
Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure.人类句子处理系统对层次结构不敏感。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):829-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797611409589. Epub 2011 May 17.
9
Evidence for early morphological decomposition: combining masked priming with magnetoencephalography.早期形态分解的证据:结合掩蔽启动与脑磁图。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3366-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00035. Epub 2011 May 10.
10
Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: the case of prefixed words.语义透明度与掩蔽形态启动:前缀词的情况
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):895-908. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.895.