• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子词表征成功解码大脑对形态复杂书面单词的反应。

Subword Representations Successfully Decode Brain Responses to Morphologically Complex Written Words.

作者信息

Hakala Tero, Lindh-Knuutila Tiina, Hultén Annika, Lehtonen Minna, Salmelin Riitta

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

Aalto NeuroImaging, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

出版信息

Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Sep 11;5(4):844-863. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00149. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1162/nol_a_00149
PMID:39301210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410357/
Abstract

This study extends the idea of decoding word-evoked brain activations using a corpus-semantic vector space to multimorphemic words in the agglutinative Finnish language. The corpus-semantic models are trained on word segments, and decoding is carried out with word vectors that are composed of these segments. We tested several alternative vector-space models using different segmentations: no segmentation (whole word), linguistic morphemes, statistical morphemes, random segmentation, and character-level 1-, 2- and 3-grams, and paired them with recorded MEG responses to multimorphemic words in a visual word recognition task. For all variants, the decoding accuracy exceeded the standard word-label permutation-based significance thresholds at 350-500 ms after stimulus onset. However, the critical segment-label permutation test revealed that only those segmentations that were morphologically aware reached significance in the brain decoding task. The results suggest that both whole-word forms and morphemes are represented in the brain and show that neural decoding using corpus-semantic word representations derived from compositional subword segments is applicable also for multimorphemic word forms. This is especially relevant for languages with complex morphology, because a large proportion of word forms are rare and it can be difficult to find statistically reliable surface representations for them in any large corpus.

摘要

本研究将利用语料库语义向量空间解码单词诱发的大脑激活这一理念扩展至黏着语芬兰语中的多语素单词。语料库语义模型基于单词片段进行训练,解码则使用由这些片段组成的单词向量来进行。我们使用不同的切分方式测试了几种替代向量空间模型:不切分(整个单词)、语言语素、统计语素、随机切分以及字符级别的单字、双字和三字组,并将它们与视觉单词识别任务中多语素单词的记录脑磁图(MEG)反应进行配对。对于所有变体,在刺激开始后350 - 500毫秒时,解码准确率超过了基于标准单词标签置换的显著性阈值。然而,关键的片段标签置换测试表明,在大脑解码任务中,只有那些具有形态意识的切分方式达到了显著性。结果表明,全词形式和语素在大脑中均有表征,并表明使用从组合子词片段派生的语料库语义单词表征进行神经解码也适用于多语素单词形式。这对于形态复杂的语言尤为重要,因为很大一部分单词形式很少见,在任何大型语料库中都很难找到统计上可靠的表面表征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/5730e9579d53/nol-5-4-844-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/3c3ea9855335/nol-5-4-844-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/64a9fdd6c8bb/nol-5-4-844-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/e96b3aad5d3d/nol-5-4-844-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/6b882320c4f4/nol-5-4-844-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/f0be25072002/nol-5-4-844-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/4c1384521117/nol-5-4-844-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/54dc2372a8af/nol-5-4-844-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/5730e9579d53/nol-5-4-844-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/3c3ea9855335/nol-5-4-844-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/64a9fdd6c8bb/nol-5-4-844-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/e96b3aad5d3d/nol-5-4-844-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/6b882320c4f4/nol-5-4-844-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/f0be25072002/nol-5-4-844-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/4c1384521117/nol-5-4-844-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/54dc2372a8af/nol-5-4-844-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb48/11410357/5730e9579d53/nol-5-4-844-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Subword Representations Successfully Decode Brain Responses to Morphologically Complex Written Words.子词表征成功解码大脑对形态复杂书面单词的反应。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Sep 11;5(4):844-863. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00149. eCollection 2024.
2
Does morphological complexity affect word segmentation? Evidence from computational modeling.形态复杂度是否影响分词?来自计算建模的证据。
Cognition. 2022 Mar;220:104960. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104960. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Visual event-related potentials reveal the early whole-word lexical processing of Chinese two-character words.视觉事件相关电位揭示了中文双字词的早期整体词的词汇加工。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Jul 4;185:108571. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108571. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
The neural representation of abstract words may arise through grounding word meaning in language itself.抽象词的神经表示可能是通过将词义根植于语言本身而产生的。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 15;42(15):4973-4984. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25593. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
EEG decoding of spoken words in bilingual listeners: from words to language invariant semantic-conceptual representations.双语听众中口语单词的脑电图解码:从单词到语言不变的语义概念表征。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 6;6:71. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00071. eCollection 2015.
6
Decomposition: to what extent? The case of Turkish.
Brain Lang. 1999;68(1-2):218-24. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2085.
7
The role of attention in processing morphologically complex spoken words: an EEG/MEG study.注意在处理形态复杂的口语词中的作用:一项 EEG/MEG 研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jan 9;6:353. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00353. eCollection 2012.
8
Decoding Semantics from Dynamic Brain Activation Patterns: From Trials to Task in EEG/MEG Source Space.从动态脑激活模式中解码语义:在 EEG/MEG 源空间中从试验到任务。
eNeuro. 2024 Mar 4;11(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0277-23.2023. Print 2024 Mar.
9
Traces of Meaning Itself: Encoding Distributional Word Vectors in Brain Activity.意义本身的痕迹:在大脑活动中编码分布式词向量
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Mar 1;1(1):54-76. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00003. eCollection 2020.
10
Neural representation of phonological wordform in temporal cortex.颞叶皮质中语音词形的神经表征。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2659-2671. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02511-6. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural decoding of semantic concepts: a systematic literature review.语义概念的神经解码:一项系统的文献综述。
J Neural Eng. 2022 Apr 13;19(2). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac619a.
2
Magnetometers vs Gradiometers for Neural Speech Decoding.磁强计与梯度计在神经语音解码中的比较。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:6543-6546. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630489.
3
The neural representation of abstract words may arise through grounding word meaning in language itself.抽象词的神经表示可能是通过将词义根植于语言本身而产生的。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 15;42(15):4973-4984. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25593. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
4
Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.形态学的统计模型预测了在视觉单词识别过程中的眼动追踪测量。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1245-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00931-7.
5
Reconstructing meaning from bits of information.从信息碎片中重建意义。
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 25;10(1):927. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08848-0.
6
Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding).大脑中的形态加工:好的(屈折变化)、坏的(派生)和丑的(复合)。
Cortex. 2019 Jul;116:4-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
7
Information spreading by a combination of MEG source estimation and multivariate pattern classification.通过脑磁图源估计和多元模式分类的组合进行信息传播。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 18;13(6):e0198806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198806. eCollection 2018.
8
Information properties of morphologically complex words modulate brain activity during word reading.形态复杂词的信息属性在单词阅读过程中调节大脑活动。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jun;39(6):2583-2595. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Using Statistical Models of Morphology in the Search for Optimal Units of Representation in the Human Mental Lexicon.利用形态学统计模型探寻人类心理词典中最优的表征单元
Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):939-973. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12576. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
10
Decoding and disrupting left midfusiform gyrus activity during word reading.在单词阅读过程中解码并干扰左侧梭状回中部的活动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 19;113(29):8162-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604126113. Epub 2016 Jun 20.