The London College of Osteopathic Medicine, London NW1 6QH, United Kingdom.
The London College of Osteopathic Medicine, London NW1 6QH, United Kingdom.
J Integr Med. 2019 Sep;17(5):328-337. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 9.
Spinal manipulation has been an effective intervention for the management of various musculoskeletal disorders. However, the mechanisms underlying the pain modulatory effects of spinal manipulation remain elusive. Although both biomechanical and neurophysiological phenomena have been thought to play a role in the observed clinical effects of spinal manipulation, a growing number of recent studies have indicated peripheral, spinal and supraspinal mechanisms of manipulation and suggested that the improved clinical outcomes are largely of neurophysiological origin. In this article, we reviewed the relevance of various neurophysiological theories with respect to the findings of mechanistic studies that demonstrated neural responses following spinal manipulation. This article also discussed whether these neural responses are associated with the possible neurophysiological mechanisms of spinal manipulation. The body of literature reviewed herein suggested some clear neurophysiological changes following spinal manipulation, which include neural plastic changes, alteration in motor neuron excitability, increase in cortical drive and many more. However, the clinical relevance of these changes in relation to the mechanisms that underlie the effectiveness of spinal manipulation is still unclear. In addition, there were some major methodological flaws in many of the reviewed studies. Future mechanistic studies should have an appropriate study design and methodology and should plan for a long-term follow-up in order to determine the clinical significance of the neural responses evoked following spinal manipulation.
脊柱推拿一直是治疗各种肌肉骨骼疾病的有效干预措施。然而,脊柱推拿对疼痛调节作用的机制仍然难以捉摸。尽管生物力学和神经生理学现象都被认为在脊柱推拿的观察到的临床效果中起作用,但越来越多的最近的研究表明,有外周、脊柱和中枢神经系统机制的推拿作用,并表明改善的临床结果主要是神经生理学起源。在本文中,我们回顾了各种神经生理学理论与机械研究结果的相关性,这些研究结果表明脊柱推拿后存在神经反应。本文还讨论了这些神经反应是否与脊柱推拿的可能神经生理学机制有关。本文综述的文献表明,脊柱推拿后存在一些明确的神经生理学变化,包括神经可塑性变化、运动神经元兴奋性改变、皮质驱动增加等。然而,这些变化与脊柱推拿有效性背后的机制之间的临床相关性尚不清楚。此外,许多综述研究存在一些主要的方法学缺陷。未来的机械研究应该有一个适当的研究设计和方法,并计划进行长期随访,以确定脊柱推拿后诱发的神经反应的临床意义。