Wise Justin C, Pae Hye Kyeong, Wolfe Christopher B, Sevcikwe Rose A, Morris Robin D, Lovett Maureen, Wolf Maryanne
Georgia State University.
University of Toronto/Hospital for Sick Children.
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2008 Aug;23(3):125-136. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00270.x. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
Limited research has examined the skills of children with a reading disability (RD) and children with RD and a mathematics disability (MD). Even less research has examined the phonological awareness (PA) and rapid automatized naming (RAN) skills in these two groups of children and how these skills relate to reading and math achievement. Additionally, various classification criteria are frequently implemented to classify children with MD. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to examine the PA and RAN skills in children who met different criteria for RD only and children with RD who are at-risk for mathematics difficulties (MDR). Participants were 114 second or third grade students with RD from public elementary schools in three large metropolitan areas. Students were classified as at-risk for mathematics difficulties utilizing a 25 percentile cutoff and a 15 percentile cutoff as assessed by the KeyMath-Revised Test (Connolly, 1988). A series of PA and RAN measures were administered along with a range of reading and mathematics measures. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that children with RD only evidenced a different pattern of results compared to children with RD + MDR. Additionally, using a more stringent criterion to classify children at-risk for mathematics difficulties resulted in a differential pattern of results when compared to a less stringent classification criterion.
仅有有限的研究考察了阅读障碍(RD)儿童以及患有阅读障碍和数学障碍(MD)儿童的技能。对这两组儿童的语音意识(PA)和快速自动命名(RAN)技能以及这些技能与阅读和数学成绩之间关系的研究甚至更少。此外,经常采用各种分类标准对患有数学障碍的儿童进行分类。因此,本研究的目的是考察仅符合不同阅读障碍标准的儿童以及有数学困难风险(MDR)的阅读障碍儿童的语音意识和快速自动命名技能。研究对象是来自三个大城市地区公立小学的114名患有阅读障碍的二、三年级学生。根据《关键数学修订版测试》(康诺利,1988年)的评估,使用第25百分位数临界值和第15百分位数临界值将学生分类为有数学困难风险。除了一系列阅读和数学测试外,还进行了一系列语音意识和快速自动命名测试。分层回归分析表明,仅患有阅读障碍的儿童与患有阅读障碍+数学困难风险的儿童相比,呈现出不同的结果模式。此外,与不太严格的分类标准相比,使用更严格的标准对有数学困难风险的儿童进行分类会导致不同的结果模式。