Ad Wilson, Ks Montes, Aj Bravo, Bt Conner, Mr Pearson
University of New Mexico.
Colorado State University.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;6(5):744-754. doi: 10.1177/2167702618775405. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
Exploratory analyses were used to identify a unique constellations of variables that are associated with marijuana use outcomes among college students. We used recursive partitioning to examine over 100 putative antecedents of lifetime marijuana user status, past-month marijuana user status, and negative marijuana-related consequences. Participants (=8141) completed measures online across 11 sites in the USA. Norms (descriptive, injunctive, and internalized norms) and marijuana identity best distinguished marijuana users from non-users (i.e., lifetime/past month), whereas marijuana use frequency, use of protective behavioral strategies, and positive/negative urgency best distinguished the degree to which users reported negative consequences. Our results demonstrate that tree-based modeling is a useful methodological tool in the selection of targets for future clinical research. Additional research is needed to determine if these factors are causal antecedents, rather than consequences or epiphenomena. We hope this large sample study provides the impetus to develop intervention strategies targeting these factors.
探索性分析用于识别与大学生大麻使用结果相关的独特变量组合。我们使用递归划分来研究超过100个终生大麻使用者状态、过去一个月大麻使用者状态以及与大麻相关的负面后果的假定前因。参与者(=8141)在美国11个地点在线完成测量。规范(描述性、禁令性和内化规范)和大麻身份最能区分大麻使用者和非使用者(即终生/过去一个月),而大麻使用频率、保护性行为策略的使用以及积极/消极紧迫性最能区分使用者报告负面后果的程度。我们的结果表明,基于树的建模是未来临床研究目标选择中的一种有用方法工具。需要进一步研究以确定这些因素是因果前因,而非后果或附带现象。我们希望这项大样本研究能推动针对这些因素制定干预策略。