Division of Infection, Department of Pediatrics, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 150, Seongan-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedics, Spine Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 22, Gwanpyeong-ro, 170 beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 14068, Republic of Korea.
Spine J. 2019 Sep;19(9):1498-1511. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 17.
In patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) and previous instrumentation requiring surgical treatment, a decision must be made between a less-invasive noninstrumented surgery, including retaining the previous instrumentation, or a more invasive additional instrumented surgery involving the complete removal of the infected tissue and firm restabilization.
To evaluate the clinical outcomes of using additional instrumentation in patients with PVO and previous instrumentation and determine the significant risk factors related to recurrent infection.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study (case control study).
PVO patients with previous instrumentation.
Recurrence of PVO and mortality.
Patients were divided into two groups (instrumented or noninstrumented) according to the presence or absence of additional instrumentation. The baseline characteristics, infection profile, and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for infection recurrence.
A total of 187 postoperative patients with PVO and previous spinal instrumentation were included. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics except the presence of a titanium cage. Surgery for additional instrumentation in patients with PVO and previous instrumentation showed similar rates of infection recurrence and mortality compared with noninstrumented surgery despite a larger number of involved vertebral levels and greater incidence of epidural abscesses. However, instrumented patients with PVO and previous instrumentation who experienced infection recurrence had worse clinical outcomes than those of the noninstrumented patients with PVO. Severe medical comorbidities, the presence of a psoas abscess, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection were associated with a higher risk of infection recurrence.
Surgery for additional instrumentation in patients with PVO and previous instrumentation showed similar rates of infection recurrence and mortality to those who underwent noninstrumented surgery despite a larger number of involved vertebral levels and an increased frequency of epidural abscesses.
对于患有化脓性脊椎骨骨髓炎(PVO)且先前有需要手术治疗的器械固定的患者,必须在微创非器械手术(包括保留先前的器械)与更具侵袭性的附加器械手术之间做出选择,后者涉及彻底清除感染组织和牢固的稳定化。
评估在患有化脓性脊椎骨骨髓炎(PVO)且先前有器械固定的患者中使用附加器械的临床结果,并确定与复发性感染相关的重要危险因素。
研究设计/设置:回顾性队列研究(病例对照研究)。
先前有器械固定的 PVO 患者。
PVO 的复发和死亡率。
根据是否存在附加器械,将患者分为两组(器械组或非器械组)。比较两组之间的基线特征、感染情况和治疗结果,并进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定感染复发的危险因素。
共纳入 187 例术后患有化脓性脊椎骨骨髓炎(PVO)且先前有脊柱器械固定的患者。除钛笼的存在外,两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。对于患有化脓性脊椎骨骨髓炎(PVO)且先前有器械固定的患者,尽管受累的椎体水平更多且硬膜外脓肿的发生率更高,但进行附加器械手术与非器械手术的感染复发率和死亡率相似。然而,患有化脓性脊椎骨骨髓炎(PVO)且先前有器械固定的感染复发患者的临床结局较非器械手术患者更差。严重的合并症、存在腰大肌脓肿和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染与感染复发的风险增加相关。
尽管受累的椎体水平更多且硬膜外脓肿的发生率更高,但对于患有化脓性脊椎骨骨髓炎(PVO)且先前有器械固定的患者,进行附加器械手术与非器械手术的感染复发率和死亡率相似。