Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Department of Public Administration and Policy, University at Albany-State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 May;22(5):e25286. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25286.
Achieving US state and municipal benchmarks to end the HIV epidemic and promote health equity requires access to comprehensive HIV care. However, this care may not be geographically accessible for all people living with HIV (PLHIV). We estimated county-level drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care across the contiguous US, assessing regional and urban-rural differences. We integrated publicly available data from four federal databases to identify and geocode sites providing comprehensive HIV care in 2015, defined as the co-located provision of core HIV medical care and support services. Leveraging street network, US Census and HIV surveillance data (2014), we used geographic analysis to estimate the fastest one-way drive time between the population-weighted county centroid and the nearest site providing HIV care for counties reporting at least five diagnosed HIV cases. We summarized HIV care sites, county-level drive time, population-weighted drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care, by US region and county rurality (2013). Geographic accessibility to HIV care was suboptimal if drive time was >30 min, a common threshold for primary care accessibility in the general US population. Tests of statistical significance were not performed, since the analysis is population-based. We identified 671 HIV care sites across the US, with 95% in urban counties. Nationwide, the median county-level drive time to HIV care is 69 min (interquartile range (IQR) 66 min). The median county-level drive time to HIV care for rural counties (90 min, IQR 61) is over twice that of urban counties (40 min, IQR 48), with the greatest urban-rural differences in the West. Nationally, population-weighted drive time, an approximation of individual-level drive time, is over five times longer in rural counties than in urban counties. Geographic access to HIV care is suboptimal for over 170,000 people diagnosed with HIV (19%), with over half of these individuals from the South and disproportionately the rural South. Nationally, approximately 80,000 (9%) drive over an hour to receive HIV care. Suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care is an important structural barrier in the US, particularly for rural residents living with HIV in the South and West. Targeted policies and interventions to address this challenge should become a priority.
实现美国州和市级的艾滋病防治目标并促进健康公平,需要提供全面的艾滋病护理。然而,并非所有艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)都能在地理上获得这种护理。我们估计了美国各地县级的前往艾滋病护理点的行车时间和次优的地理可达性,评估了区域和城乡差异。我们整合了来自四个联邦数据库的公开数据,以确定和地理标记 2015 年提供综合艾滋病护理的地点,定义为核心艾滋病医疗和支持服务的共同提供。利用街道网络、美国人口普查和艾滋病监测数据(2014 年),我们使用地理分析估计了报告至少 5 例确诊艾滋病病例的县的人口加权县中心和最近提供艾滋病护理的地点之间最快的单程行车时间。根据美国区域和农村县的特点(2013 年),我们总结了艾滋病护理点、县级行车时间、人口加权行车时间和艾滋病护理的次优地理可达性。如果行车时间超过 30 分钟,即美国一般人群中初级保健可达性的常见阈值,则认为获得艾滋病护理的地理可达性较差。由于分析是基于人口的,因此未进行统计意义的检验。我们在美国各地确定了 671 个艾滋病护理点,其中 95%位于城市县。全国范围内,县级前往艾滋病护理点的平均行车时间为 69 分钟(四分位距(IQR)为 66 分钟)。农村县的县级前往艾滋病护理点的平均行车时间(90 分钟,IQR 为 61 分钟)是城市县的两倍多,西部地区城乡差异最大。全国范围内,人口加权行车时间,即个体层面行车时间的近似值,在农村县是城市县的五倍以上。超过 17 万人(19%)被诊断患有艾滋病,他们获得艾滋病护理的地理可达性较差,其中一半以上来自南部,而且南部农村地区的比例不成比例。全国范围内,大约有 8 万人(9%)开车超过一小时去接受艾滋病护理。艾滋病护理的次优地理可达性是美国的一个重要结构性障碍,特别是对于南部和西部的农村地区艾滋病毒感染者而言。解决这一挑战的有针对性的政策和干预措施应成为当务之急。