Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020 Apr 2;28(3):483-490. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1583346. Epub 2019 May 22.
: To evaluate the performance and speed of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) when identifying the pathogenic microorganism of endophthalmitis compared to conventional microbiological culturing.: Forty-four patients with suspected endophthalmitis who had undergone vitrectomy were enrolled. Vitreous specimen was analyzed using either conventional culturing or MALDI-TOF MS.: The identification rates of the conventional microbiological culture and MALDI-TOF MS were 45.5% (20/44) and 65.9% (29/44), respectively (Kappa value 0.787, P < 0.000). The mean detection times by the standard culturing method and MALDI-TOF MS were 5.39 ± 0.56d and 3.17 ± 0.40d (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MALDI-TOF MS were 70.59%, 54.17%, 80.00%, and 86.67%, respectively. Polymicrobial endophthalmitis was identified in 6.82% of the patients (3/44) using conventional microbiological culturing. However, MALDI-TOF MS failed to identify any polymicrobial infection.: With a higher sensitivity, acceptable specificity and a shorter detection time, MALDI-TOF MS was an efficient technique for the rapid identification of a pathogenic microorganism in endophthalmitis.
评估基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)在识别眼内炎致病微生物方面的性能和速度,与传统微生物培养方法进行比较。
纳入 44 例疑似眼内炎并接受玻璃体切除术的患者。采用传统培养或 MALDI-TOF MS 分析玻璃体标本。
传统微生物培养和 MALDI-TOF MS 的鉴定率分别为 45.5%(20/44)和 65.9%(29/44)(Kappa 值 0.787,P < 0.000)。标准培养方法和 MALDI-TOF MS 的平均检测时间分别为 5.39 ± 0.56d 和 3.17 ± 0.40d(P < 0.001)。MALDI-TOF MS 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 70.59%、54.17%、80.00%和 86.67%。传统微生物培养方法鉴定出 6.82%(3/44)的患者为混合感染性眼内炎。然而,MALDI-TOF MS 未能鉴定出任何混合感染。
MALDI-TOF MS 具有较高的灵敏度、可接受的特异性和较短的检测时间,是一种快速鉴定眼内炎致病微生物的有效技术。