College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Centre for Remote Health: a Johanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Flinders University, Alice Spring, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 22;19(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1606-y.
Motivational interviewing (MI) is internationally recognised as an effective intervention to facilitate health-related behaviour change; although, how it is best implemented and maintained in everyday clinical practice is not so clear. The aim of this study is to understand how MI as an intervention can be embedded and sustained in the clinical practice and learning environments.
A concurrent iterative mixed methodology was utilised. Data collection occurred in two parts: a scoping review to identify reported barriers and enablers to embedding and sustaining MI in healthcare settings, and a survey of health professionals at an international clinical educator workshop on the topic. Results from both methods were integrated at the analysis phase ('following a thread') to understand how MI is embedded and the fidelity sustained in the clinical environments. Complexity theory as a conceptualising framework was utilised.
Eleven studies were included, and 30 health professionals were surveyed. Sustainability of MI at micro-clinical levels can be fostered through use of enabling technology, focus on patient-centred care, personnel development and process improvement. At the meso-organisational level, developing shared vision, creating opportunities and an organisational culture supportive of continuous learning are relevant issues. At the macro levels, adopting systems thinking and a learning organisation approach is important for sustaining MI.
In addressing the recognised barriers to embedding and sustaining MI in health service provisions, clinical educators could potentially play a central role as change agents within and across the complex clinical system.
动机性访谈(MI)被国际公认为一种有效的干预措施,可促进与健康相关的行为改变;然而,在日常临床实践中如何最好地实施和维持 MI 尚不清楚。本研究旨在了解如何将 MI 作为一种干预措施嵌入和维持在临床实践和学习环境中。
采用同时迭代混合方法。数据收集分两部分进行:一是范围综述,以确定在医疗保健环境中嵌入和维持 MI 的报告障碍和促进因素;二是对国际临床教育者关于该主题的研讨会的卫生专业人员进行调查。两种方法的结果在分析阶段(“遵循线索”)进行整合,以了解 MI 是如何嵌入的以及在临床环境中保持的保真度。复杂性理论被用作概念化框架。
纳入了 11 项研究,对 30 名卫生专业人员进行了调查。通过使用支持技术、关注以患者为中心的护理、人员发展和流程改进,可以促进微观临床层面的 MI 可持续性。在中观组织层面,发展共同愿景、创造机会和支持持续学习的组织文化是相关问题。在宏观层面,采用系统思维和学习型组织方法对于维持 MI 至关重要。
在解决在卫生服务提供中嵌入和维持 MI 的公认障碍时,临床教育者作为复杂临床系统内和跨系统的变革推动者可能发挥核心作用。