Department of Nanomedicine and Theranostics, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine , RWTH Aachen University , 52074 Aachen , Germany.
Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences , Utrecht University , 3584 CG Utrecht , The Netherlands.
Acc Chem Res. 2019 Jun 18;52(6):1543-1554. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00148. Epub 2019 May 23.
Nanomedicine holds significant potential to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Thus far, nanomedicines, i.e., 1-100(0) nm sized drug delivery systems, have been primarily used to improve the balance between the efficacy and toxicity of conjugated or entrapped chemotherapeutic drugs. The clinical performance of cancer nanomedicines has been somewhat disappointing, which is arguably mostly due to the lack of tools and technologies for patient stratification. Conversely, the clinical progress made with immunotherapy has been spectacular, achieving complete cures and inducing long-term survival in advanced-stage patients. Unfortunately, however, immunotherapy only works well in relatively small subsets of patients. Increasing amounts of preclinical and clinical data demonstrate that combining nanomedicine with immunotherapy can boost therapeutic outcomes, by turning "cold" nonimmunoresponsive tumors and metastases into "hot" immunoresponsive lesions. Nano-immunotherapy can be realized via three different approaches, in which nanomedicines are used (1) to target cancer cells, (2) to target the tumor immune microenvironment, and (3) to target the peripheral immune system. When targeting cancer cells, nanomedicines typically aim to induce immunogenic cell death, thereby triggering the release of tumor antigens and danger-associated molecular patterns, such as calreticulin translocation, high mobility group box 1 protein and adenosine triphosphate. The latter serve as adjuvants to alert antigen-presenting cells to take up, process and present the former, thereby promoting the generation of CD8 cytotoxic T cells. Nanomedicines targeting the tumor immune microenvironment potentiate cancer immunotherapy by inhibiting immunosuppressive cells, such as M2-like tumor-associated macrophages, as well as by reducing the expression of immunosuppressive molecules, such as transforming growth factor beta. In addition, nanomedicines can be employed to promote the activity of antigen-presenting cells and cytotoxic T cells in the tumor immune microenvironment. Nanomedicines targeting the peripheral immune system aim to enhance antigen presentation and cytotoxic T cell production in secondary lymphoid organs, such as lymph nodes and spleen, as well as to engineer and strengthen peripheral effector immune cell populations, thereby promoting anticancer immunity. While the majority of immunomodulatory nanomedicines are in preclinical development, exciting results have already been reported in initial clinical trials. To ensure efficient translation of nano-immunotherapy constructs and concepts, we have to consider biomarkers in their clinical development, to make sure that the right nanomedicine formulation is combined with the right immunotherapy in the right patient. In this context, we have to learn from currently ongoing efforts in nano-biomarker identification as well as from partially already established immuno-biomarker initiatives, such as the Immunoscore and the cancer immunogram. Together, these protocols will help to capture the nano-immuno status in individual patients, enabling the identification and use of individualized and improved nanomedicine-based treatments to boost the performance of cancer immunotherapy.
纳米医学在提高癌症免疫疗法的疗效方面具有重要潜力。迄今为止,纳米药物(即 1-100(0)nm 大小的药物传递系统)主要用于改善共轭或包封的化疗药物的疗效和毒性之间的平衡。癌症纳米药物的临床表现有些令人失望,这主要是因为缺乏用于患者分层的工具和技术。相反,免疫疗法的临床进展令人瞩目,在晚期患者中实现了完全治愈并诱导了长期生存。然而,不幸的是,免疫疗法仅在相对较小的患者亚群中效果良好。越来越多的临床前和临床数据表明,通过将纳米医学与免疫疗法相结合,可以提高治疗效果,将“冷”无免疫反应性肿瘤和转移灶转化为“热”免疫反应性病变。纳米免疫疗法可以通过三种不同的方法实现,其中纳米药物用于(1)靶向癌细胞,(2)靶向肿瘤免疫微环境,和(3)靶向外周免疫系统。当靶向癌细胞时,纳米药物通常旨在诱导免疫原性细胞死亡,从而触发肿瘤抗原和危险相关分子模式的释放,如钙网蛋白易位、高迁移率族框 1 蛋白和三磷酸腺苷。后者充当佐剂,提醒抗原呈递细胞摄取、处理和呈递前者,从而促进 CD8 细胞毒性 T 细胞的产生。靶向肿瘤免疫微环境的纳米药物通过抑制免疫抑制细胞(如 M2 样肿瘤相关巨噬细胞)以及减少免疫抑制分子(如转化生长因子β)的表达来增强癌症免疫疗法。此外,纳米药物可用于促进肿瘤免疫微环境中抗原呈递细胞和细胞毒性 T 细胞的活性。靶向外周免疫系统的纳米药物旨在增强次级淋巴器官(如淋巴结和脾脏)中的抗原呈递和细胞毒性 T 细胞产生,以及工程化和增强外周效应免疫细胞群体,从而促进抗癌免疫。虽然大多数免疫调节纳米药物处于临床前开发阶段,但在初步临床试验中已经报告了令人兴奋的结果。为了确保纳米免疫疗法构建体和概念的有效转化,我们必须在其临床开发中考虑生物标志物,以确保将正确的纳米药物制剂与正确的免疫疗法相结合,用于正确的患者。在这方面,我们必须从当前正在进行的纳米生物标志物鉴定工作以及部分已经建立的免疫生物标志物计划中吸取经验,例如免疫评分和癌症免疫图谱。这些方案将共同帮助捕获个体患者的纳米免疫状态,从而能够识别和使用个体化和改进的基于纳米药物的治疗方法,以提高癌症免疫疗法的疗效。