Suppr超能文献

孤独体验量表用于评估边缘型人格障碍的编制与验证。

Development and validation of an experience of time alone scale for borderline personality disorder.

机构信息

Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0217350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217350. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Intolerance of aloneness is considered a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD) that is clinically significant, yet under-researched. This study developed a measure of aloneness for individuals with BPD.

METHOD

Interviews investigating the experience of aloneness for BPD participants (n = 12) formed the basis for the development of the measure. Pilot testing then occurred with BPD participants, control participants and qualified respondents. Validity, reliability and factor analysis of an Experience of Time Alone Scale (ETAS) was conducted with BPD participants (n = 112) and a comparison control group (n = 105).

RESULTS

A three factor structure was revealed: (a) Cannot Cope Alone (α = .92), (b) Need to Escape from Others (α = .90), and (c) Consumed in Intolerable Distress (α = .88). The measure correlated significantly (p < .01) with the Mental Health Inventory, the Aloneness and Evocative Memory Scale, and the Hurvich Experience Inventory- Revised. Comparisons revealed highly significant differences between the BPD sample and control group on all subscales and the total score (U = 75.5, p = < .001, r = -.85).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents one of the first empirical examinations of a construct that has largely only been studied theoretically. This newly developed measure may contribute to diagnosis and therapy.

摘要

背景/目的:无法忍受孤独被认为是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的核心特征之一,具有重要的临床意义,但研究不足。本研究开发了一种用于测量 BPD 患者孤独感的方法。

方法

对 BPD 患者(n=12)进行访谈,以了解他们的孤独感体验,以此为基础开发了孤独感量表。然后对 BPD 患者、对照组患者和合格受访者进行了试点测试。对 BPD 患者(n=112)和对照组(n=105)进行了时间独处体验量表(ETAS)的有效性、信度和因子分析。

结果

揭示了一个三因素结构:(a)无法独自应对(α=.92),(b)需要逃避他人(α=.90),(c)无法忍受的痛苦(α=.88)。该量表与心理健康量表、孤独感和唤起记忆量表、Hurvich 经验量表修订版显著相关(p<.01)。比较显示,BPD 组和对照组在所有子量表和总分上存在高度显著差异(U=75.5,p<.001,r= -.85)。

结论

本研究是对一个主要从理论上研究的结构进行的首次实证检验之一。新开发的量表可能有助于诊断和治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ecb/6532922/6a589f4db574/pone.0217350.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of an experience of time alone scale for borderline personality disorder.
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0217350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217350. eCollection 2019.
2
Loneliness, social networks, and social functioning in borderline personality disorder.
Personal Disord. 2017 Oct;8(4):349-356. doi: 10.1037/per0000208. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
5
Implicit and explicit self-concept of neuroticism in borderline personality disorder.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;73(3):159-168. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1582694. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Validation of the Spanish version of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2016 Oct-Dec;9(4):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
7
Construct Validity of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder in Two Singaporean Samples.
J Pers Disord. 2019 Aug;33(4):450-469. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2018_32_352. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
8
Attachment and borderline personality disorder: implications for psychotherapy.
Psychopathology. 2005 Mar-Apr;38(2):64-74. doi: 10.1159/000084813. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
9
Measuring the shadows: A systematic review of chronic emptiness in borderline personality disorder.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0233970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233970. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Intolerance of aloneness as a prospective predictor of suicidal ideation during COVID-19.
J Affect Disord Rep. 2023 Jan;11:100469. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100469. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Measuring the shadows: A systematic review of chronic emptiness in borderline personality disorder.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0233970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233970. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying core deficits in a dimensional model of Borderline Personality Disorder features: A network analysis.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;6(5):685-703. doi: 10.1177/2167702618769560. Epub 2018 May 18.
3
The aetiology of borderline personality disorder (BPD): contemporary theories and putative mechanisms.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Jun;21:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
4
Revising the diagnosis of personality disorder: Can it be single, clinical and factorial?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;52(2):202-203. doi: 10.1177/0004867417741984. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
The centrality of affective instability and identity in Borderline Personality Disorder: Evidence from network analysis.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186695. eCollection 2017.
6
Personality disorder: A mental health priority area.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;51(9):872-875. doi: 10.1177/0004867417717798. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
8
Affective Instability and Reactivity in Depressed Patients With and Without Borderline Pathology.
J Pers Disord. 2016 Dec;30(6):776-795. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_230. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
9
Early child-parent attachment and peer relations: a meta-analysis of recent research.
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Feb;28(1):118-23. doi: 10.1037/a0035736.
10
Challenges to getting evidence into practice: expert clinician perspectives on psychotherapy for personality disorders.
J Ment Health. 2013 Dec;22(6):482-91. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2013.779367. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验