Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Personality Disorders Lab, Parma-Milan, Italy.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186695. eCollection 2017.
We argue that the series of traits characterizing Borderline Personality Disorder samples do not weigh equally. In this regard, we believe that network approaches employed recently in Personality and Psychopathology research to provide information about the differential relationships among symptoms would be useful to test our claim. To our knowledge, this approach has never been applied to personality disorders. We applied network analysis to the nine Borderline Personality Disorder traits to explore their relationships in two samples drawn from university students and clinical populations (N = 1317 and N = 96, respectively). We used the Fused Graphical Lasso, a technique that allows estimating networks from different populations separately while considering their similarities and differences. Moreover, we examined centrality indices to determine the relative importance of each symptom in each network. The general structure of the two networks was very similar in the two samples, although some differences were detected. Results indicate the centrality of mainly affective instability, identity, and effort to avoid abandonment aspects in Borderline Personality Disorder. Results are consistent with the new DSM Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. We discuss them in terms of implications for therapy.
我们认为,边缘型人格障碍样本所具有的一系列特征并不具有同等重要性。在这方面,我们认为,人格与心理病理学研究中最近采用的网络方法可以提供有关症状之间差异关系的信息,这对于验证我们的观点将非常有用。据我们所知,这种方法从未应用于人格障碍。我们将网络分析应用于九个边缘型人格障碍特征,以探索它们在分别来自大学生和临床人群的两个样本(分别为 N=1317 和 N=96)中的关系。我们使用了融合图形套索,这是一种允许从不同人群中分别估计网络的技术,同时考虑它们的相似性和差异性。此外,我们还检查了中心性指数,以确定每个网络中每个症状的相对重要性。两个网络的总体结构在两个样本中非常相似,尽管发现了一些差异。结果表明,在边缘型人格障碍中,主要的情感不稳定、身份认同和避免被遗弃方面的特征具有中心性。结果与新的 DSM 人格障碍替代模型一致。我们根据治疗的意义对它们进行了讨论。