Suppr超能文献

立体定向放射外科消融治疗室性心动过速。

Stereotactic radiosurgery for ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Europace. 2019 Jul 1;21(7):1088-1095. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz133.

Abstract

AIMS

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for ventricular tachycardias (VTs) could be an option after failed catheter ablation. In this study, we analysed the long-term efficacy and toxicity of SBRT applied as a bail-out procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with structural heart disease and unsuccessful catheter ablations for VTs underwent SBRT. The planning target volume (PTV) was accurately delineated using exported 3D electroanatomical maps with the delineated critical part of re-entry circuits. This was defined by detailed electroanatomic mapping and by pacing manoeuvres during the procedure. Using the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead as a surrogate contrast marker for respiratory movement compensation, 25 Gy was delivered to the PTV using CyberKnife. We evaluated occurrences of sustained VT, electrical storm, antitachycardia pacing, and shock; time to death; and radiation-induced events. From 2014 until March 2017, 10 patients underwent radiosurgical ablation (mean PTV, 22.15 mL; treatment duration, 68 min). After radiosurgery, four patients experienced nausea and one patient presented gradual progression of mitral regurgitation. During the follow-up (median 28 months), VT burden was reduced by 87.5% compared with baseline (P = 0.012) and three patients suffered non-arrhythmic deaths. After the blanking period, VT recurred in eight of 10 patients. The mean time to first antitachycardia pacing and shock were 6.5 and 21 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiotherapy appears to show long-term safety and effectiveness for VT ablation in structural heart disease inaccessible to catheter ablation. We report one possible radiation-related toxicity and promising overall survival, warranting evaluation in a prospective multicentre clinical trial.

摘要

目的

立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)对导管消融失败后的室性心动过速(VTs)可能是一种选择。本研究分析了 SBRT 作为抢救性治疗的长期疗效和毒性。

方法和结果

患有结构性心脏病和 VT 导管消融失败的患者接受 SBRT。使用导出的 3D 电解剖图准确勾画计划靶区(PTV),并用详细的电解剖图和术中起搏操作勾画折返环路的关键部分。使用植入式心脏复律除颤器导线作为呼吸运动补偿的替代对比标志物,使用 CyberKnife 将 25Gy 传递到 PTV。我们评估了持续性 VT、电风暴、抗心动过速起搏和电击的发生情况;死亡时间;以及放射性事件。从 2014 年到 2017 年 3 月,10 名患者接受了放射外科消融(平均 PTV,22.15mL;治疗时间,68 分钟)。放射外科治疗后,4 名患者出现恶心,1 名患者出现二尖瓣反流逐渐加重。在随访期间(中位时间 28 个月),VT 负荷与基线相比降低了 87.5%(P=0.012),3 名患者发生非心律失常性死亡。在空白期后,10 名患者中有 8 名再次出现 VT。首次抗心动过速起搏和电击的平均时间分别为 6.5 和 21 个月。

结论

立体定向体部放射治疗在导管消融无法到达的结构性心脏病患者中显示出 VT 消融的长期安全性和有效性。我们报告了一种可能的与辐射相关的毒性和有前景的总生存情况,需要在前瞻性多中心临床试验中进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验