Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Oct 9;21(10):1263-1272. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz096.
Precision medicine trials targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in glioblastoma patients require selection for EGFR-amplified tumors. However, there is currently no gold standard in determining the amplification status of EGFR or variant III (EGFRvIII) expression. Here, we aimed to determine which technique and which cutoffs are suitable to determine EGFR amplification status.
We compared fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and real-time quantitative (RT-q)PCR data from patients screened for trial inclusion into the Intellance 2 clinical trial, with data from a panel-based next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (both DNA and RNA).
By using data from >1000 samples, we show that at least 50% of EGFR amplified nuclei should be present to define EGFR gene amplification by FISH. Gene amplification (as determined by FISH) correlates with EGFR expression levels (as determined by RT-qPCR) with receiver operating characteristics analysis showing an area under the curve of up to 0.902. EGFR expression as assessed by RT-qPCR therefore may function as a surrogate marker for EGFR amplification. Our NGS data show that EGFR copy numbers can strongly vary between tumors, with levels ranging from 2 to more than 100 copies per cell. Levels exceeding 5 gene copies can be used to define EGFR-amplification by NGS; below this level, FISH detects very few (if any) EGFR amplified nuclei and none of the samples express EGFRvIII.
Our data from central laboratories and diagnostic sequencing facilities, using material from patients eligible for clinical trial inclusion, help define the optimal cutoff for various techniques to determine EGFR amplification for diagnostic purposes.
针对胶质母细胞瘤患者表皮生长因子受体 (EGFR) 的精准医学试验需要针对 EGFR 扩增肿瘤进行选择。然而,目前尚无确定 EGFR 扩增状态或变体 III(EGFRvIII)表达的金标准。在这里,我们旨在确定哪种技术和哪种截止值适合确定 EGFR 扩增状态。
我们比较了筛选参加 Intellance 2 临床试验的患者的荧光原位杂交 (FISH) 和实时定量 (RT-q)PCR 数据与基于面板的下一代测序 (NGS) 平台的数据(DNA 和 RNA)。
通过使用来自>1000 个样本的数据,我们表明,通过 FISH 定义 EGFR 基因扩增至少需要存在 50%的 EGFR 扩增核。基因扩增(通过 FISH 确定)与 EGFR 表达水平相关(通过 RT-qPCR 确定),接受者操作特征分析显示曲线下面积高达 0.902。因此,通过 RT-qPCR 评估的 EGFR 表达可作为 EGFR 扩增的替代标志物。我们的 NGS 数据显示,肿瘤之间的 EGFR 拷贝数可以强烈变化,水平范围从每个细胞 2 个到 100 多个拷贝。可以使用超过 5 个基因拷贝数来通过 NGS 定义 EGFR 扩增;低于此水平,FISH 检测到非常少(如果有的话)EGFR 扩增核,并且没有一个样本表达 EGFRvIII。
我们来自中央实验室和诊断测序设施的数据,使用有资格参加临床试验的患者的材料,有助于为诊断目的确定各种技术确定 EGFR 扩增的最佳截止值。