Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing,
Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods.
Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2185.
Our primary aim was to evaluate the effects of 2 family-based obesity management interventions compared with a control group on BMI in low-income adolescents with overweight or obesity.
In this randomized clinical trial, 360 urban-residing youth and a parent were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 behaviorally distinct family interventions or an education-only control group. Eligible children were entering the sixth grade with a BMI ≥85th percentile. Interventions were 3 years in length; data were collected annually for 3 years. Effects of the interventions on BMI slope (primary outcome) over 3 years and a set of secondary outcomes were assessed.
Participants were primarily African American (77%), had a family income of <25 000 per year, and obese at enrollment (68%). BMI increased over time in all study groups, with group increases ranging from 0.95 to 1.08. In an intent-to-treat analysis, no significant differences were found in adjusted BMI slopes between either of the family-based interventions and the control group ( = .35). No differences were found between the experimental and control groups on secondary outcomes of diet, physical activity, sleep, perceived stress, or cardiometabolic factors. No evidence of effect modification of the study arms by sex, race and/or ethnicity, household income, baseline levels of child and parent obesity, or exposure to a school fitness program were found.
In this low-income, adolescent population, neither of the family-based interventions improved BMI or health-related secondary outcomes. Future interventions should more fully address poverty and other social issues contributing to childhood obesity.
我们的主要目的是评估 2 种基于家庭的肥胖管理干预措施与对照组相比,对低收入超重或肥胖青少年体重指数(BMI)的影响。
在这项随机临床试验中,360 名城市居住的青少年及其家长被随机分配到 2 种行为上明显不同的家庭干预组或仅接受教育的对照组。符合条件的儿童在进入六年级时 BMI 处于第 85 百分位以上。干预措施持续 3 年;在 3 年内每年收集数据。评估了干预措施对 3 年内 BMI 斜率(主要结局)和一系列次要结局的影响。
参与者主要是非洲裔美国人(77%),家庭收入<25000 美元/年,入组时肥胖(68%)。所有研究组的 BMI 随时间增加,组间增加幅度为 0.95 至 1.08。在意向治疗分析中,未发现任何一种基于家庭的干预措施与对照组之间调整后的 BMI 斜率存在显著差异( =.35)。实验组与对照组在饮食、体育活动、睡眠、感知压力或心血管代谢因素等次要结局上也没有差异。未发现研究组之间存在性别、种族和/或民族、家庭收入、儿童和家长肥胖基线水平或是否参加学校健身计划等因素的交互作用。
在这个低收入的青少年人群中,两种基于家庭的干预措施都没有改善 BMI 或与健康相关的次要结局。未来的干预措施应更充分地解决导致儿童肥胖的贫困和其他社会问题。