Nieto Mercedes, Robles Juan Carlos, Causse Manuel, Gutiérrez Leticia, Cruz Perez Maria, Ferrer Ricard, Xercavins Mariona, Herrero Eugenio, Sirvent Elia, Fernández Cristina, Anguita Paloma, Merino Paloma
Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Infect Dis Ther. 2019 Sep;8(3):429-444. doi: 10.1007/s40121-019-0248-z. Epub 2019 May 24.
We evaluated the diagnostic reliability of serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) versus blood culture, abdominal fluid or both (composite measure) in patients receiving empirical antifungal treatment for suspected invasive candidiasis.
This observational, prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study in Spain enrolled 176 critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Separate blood samples for culture and serum PCR were taken before the start of antifungal therapy. Patient assessment was performed according to each site's usual clinical practice. The primary end point was concordance between serum PCR and blood culture. Secondary end points were concordance between serum PCR and a positive abdominal fluid sample or the composite measure. Quality indices included sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) and kappa indices.
Among 175 evaluable patients, rates of Candida detection were similar for serum PCR (n = 16/175, 9.1%) versus blood culture (n = 14/175, 8.0%). Quality indices for serum PCR relative to blood culture were: sensitivity 21.4%; specificity 91.9%; PPV 18.8%; NPV 93.1%; kappa index 0.125. Thirty-two abdominal fluid samples were positive. Quality indices for serum PCR versus abdominal fluid were: sensitivity 31.3%; specificity 83.0%; PPV 15.6%; NPV 92.3%; kappa index 0.100. Quality indices for serum PCR versus the composite measure were: sensitivity 15.8%; specificity 92.7%; PPV 37.5%; NPV 79.9%; kappa index 0.107.
The sensitivity of serum PCR for Candida detection was low and the rate of concordance was low between serum PCR and the other diagnostic techniques used to identify Candida infections. Hospital-based diagnostic tests need optimising to improve outcomes in patients with suspected invasive candidiasis.
Astellas Pharma Inc.
我们评估了在接受经验性抗真菌治疗的疑似侵袭性念珠菌病患者中,血清聚合酶链反应(PCR)与血培养、腹水培养或两者(综合指标)相比的诊断可靠性。
这项在西班牙进行的观察性、前瞻性、非干预性多中心研究纳入了176名入住重症监护病房的危重症患者。在抗真菌治疗开始前采集用于培养的血样和血清PCR样本。根据各研究点的常规临床实践对患者进行评估。主要终点是血清PCR与血培养结果的一致性。次要终点是血清PCR与腹水样本阳性或综合指标结果的一致性。质量指标包括敏感性、特异性、阳性/阴性预测值(PPV/NPV)和kappa指数。
在175例可评估患者中,血清PCR检测念珠菌的比例(n = 16/175,9.1%)与血培养(n = 14/175,8.0%)相似。血清PCR相对于血培养的质量指标为:敏感性21.4%;特异性91.9%;PPV 18.8%;NPV 93.1%;kappa指数0.125。32份腹水样本呈阳性。血清PCR相对于腹水样本的质量指标为:敏感性31.3%;特异性83.0%;PPV 15.6%;NPV 92.3%;kappa指数0.100。血清PCR相对于综合指标的质量指标为:敏感性15.8%;特异性92.7%;PPV 37.5%;NPV 79.9%;kappa指数0.