Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e233-e239. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.120. Epub 2019 May 23.
Same-day surgery has been demonstrated to be a safe and cost-effective alternative to traditional inpatient surgery. Several studies have demonstrated no differences in the postoperative complication profile or 30-day hospital readmission rates with outpatient versus inpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, none of these studies compared the outcomes in elderly patients (aged >65 years) undergoing ACDF. Whether the results from previous studies can be applied to this subgroup pf patients remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare the 30-day hospital readmission rates for Medicare patients (aged >65 years) undergoing outpatient versus inpatient ACDF.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a Medicare database, including data from 17,421 patients. Of the 17,421 patients, 16,386 had undergone inpatient ACDF and 1035, outpatient ACDF. Age, sex, comorbidities, postoperative complications, readmission rates, and overall financial costs were compared between the 2 cohorts.
In a Medicare sample (aged >65 years), inpatient ACDF was associated with a greater incidence of postoperative complications compared with outpatient ACDF. Outpatient surgery was associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative complications (urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction) and significantly lower treatment costs (P ≤ 0.001). All-cause 30-day hospital readmission rates were also greater for inpatients (10.1% vs. 4%; P = 0.17).
The results from the present study suggest that outpatient ACDF appears to be safe and effective with low complication and readmission rates in a Medicare patient sample.
日间手术已被证明是一种安全且具有成本效益的替代传统住院手术的方法。几项研究表明,门诊与住院前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)相比,术后并发症谱或 30 天内再入院率没有差异。然而,这些研究都没有比较接受 ACDF 的老年患者(年龄> 65 岁)的结果。以前的研究结果是否可以应用于这一亚组患者尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较 Medicare 患者(年龄> 65 岁)行门诊与住院 ACDF 的 30 天内再入院率。
我们对 Medicare 数据库进行了回顾性分析,纳入了 17421 例患者的数据。在这 17421 例患者中,16386 例行住院 ACDF,1035 例行门诊 ACDF。比较了两组患者的年龄、性别、合并症、术后并发症、再入院率和总体经济成本。
在 Medicare 样本(年龄> 65 岁)中,与门诊 ACDF 相比,住院 ACDF 术后并发症发生率更高。门诊手术与术后并发症发生率显著降低(尿路感染、手术部位感染、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞和心肌梗死)和治疗费用显著降低(P ≤ 0.001)相关。住院患者的全因 30 天内再入院率也更高(10.1%比 4%;P=0.17)。
本研究结果表明,门诊 ACDF 在 Medicare 患者样本中似乎是安全有效的,并发症和再入院率较低。