Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand; United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, USA.
Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 May;3(5):e226-e234. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30070-1.
Several small experimental studies and cross-sectional observational studies have shown that exposure to the natural environment might protect against attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or moderate the symptoms of ADHD in children. We aimed to assess whether exposure to the natural environment protects against ADHD and whether this hypothesised protective effect varies across a child's life course.
We did a longitudinal study with data collected from all children born in New Zealand in 1998, excluding those without an address history, those who were not singleton births, and those who died or emigrated before 18 years of age. We used Statistics New Zealand's Integrated Data Infrastructure to identify children with ADHD and to define covariates. ADHD was defined according to hospital diagnosis or pharmacy records (two or more prescriptions for ADHD drugs). Exposure to green space for each year of a child's life (from gestation to 18 years of age) was estimated at the meshblock level (the smallest geographical unit for which the New Zealand Census reports data) using normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land-use data from Landcare Research New Zealand. We used logit models to assess the associations between ADHD prevalence and minimum, maximum, and mean lifetime NDVI, as well as rural living, controlling for sex, ethnicity, mother's educational level, mother's smoking status, mother's age at parturition, birth order, antibiotic use, and low birthweight.
Of the 57 450 children born in New Zealand in 1998, 49 923 were eligible and had available data, and were included in the analysis. Children who had always lived in a rural area after 2 years of age were less likely to develop ADHD (odds ratio [OR] 0·670 [95% CI 0·461-0·974), as were those with increased minimum NDVI exposure after age 2 years (standardised OR for exposure vs first quartile: second quartile 0·841 [0·707-0·999]; third quartile 0·809 [0·680-0·963]; fourth quartile 0·664 [0·548-0·805]). In early life (prenatal to age 2 years), neither rural living nor NDVI were protective against ADHD. Neither mean nor maximum greenness was significantly protective against ADHD.
Rurality and increased minimum greenness were strongly and independently associated with a reduced risk of ADHD. Increasing a child's minimum lifetime greenness exposure, as opposed to maximum or mean exposure, might provide the greatest increment of protection against the disorder.
None.
几项小型实验研究和横断面观察性研究表明,接触自然环境可能有助于预防注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD),或减轻儿童 ADHD 的症状。我们旨在评估接触自然环境是否可以预防 ADHD,以及这种假设的保护作用是否会随着儿童的生命历程而变化。
我们进行了一项纵向研究,数据来自于 1998 年在新西兰出生的所有儿童,不包括没有地址记录的儿童、非单胎出生的儿童以及在 18 岁前死亡或移民的儿童。我们使用新西兰统计局的综合数据基础设施来确定 ADHD 儿童,并定义协变量。ADHD 根据医院诊断或药房记录(两种或更多种 ADHD 药物的处方)来定义。使用归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)和新西兰土地护理研究公司的土地使用数据,在网格块级别(新西兰人口普查报告数据的最小地理单位)估计儿童一生中每年接触绿色空间的情况(从妊娠到 18 岁)。我们使用 logit 模型评估 ADHD 患病率与最小、最大和平均终生 NDVI 以及农村居住之间的关联,同时控制了性别、种族、母亲的教育水平、母亲的吸烟状况、母亲的分娩年龄、出生顺序、抗生素使用和低出生体重。
在 1998 年在新西兰出生的 57450 名儿童中,有 49923 名符合条件且有可用数据,被纳入了分析。在 2 岁以后一直居住在农村地区的儿童患 ADHD 的可能性较低(优势比 [OR]0.670 [95%CI0.461-0.974]),而在 2 岁以后 NDVI 最低暴露量增加的儿童也是如此(暴露与第一四分位相比的标准化 OR:第二四分位 0.841 [0.707-0.999];第三四分位 0.809 [0.680-0.963];第四四分位 0.664 [0.548-0.805])。在生命早期(产前至 2 岁),农村生活和 NDVI 均不能预防 ADHD。平均和最大绿色值均与 ADHD 无显著相关性。
农村生活和最低 NDVI 增加与 ADHD 风险降低密切相关。与最大或平均暴露相比,增加儿童最低终生绿色暴露量可能会提供对该疾病的最大保护增量。
无。