Suppr超能文献

化学位移 MRI 对肾上腺病变的特征分析:1.5T 和 3T MRI 的对比。

Characterization of adrenal lesions on chemical shift MRI: comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ege University School of Medicine, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Oct;44(10):3359-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02067-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare three chemical shift MRI techniques [two-dimensional (2D) dual gradient echo (dGRE), 3D VIBE, and 3D VIBE-Dixon] at 3 T and 2D dGRE technique at 1.5 T to assess their ability of detecting microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas and differentiating between adenomas and non-adenomas.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with 97 lesions (78 adenomas, 19 non-adenomas) underwent both 1.5 T and 3 T chemical shift MRI. The Wilcoxon signed-ranked test was used to determine if there was significant difference between the signal intensity index (SII) values of each technique to assess their ability to detect microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas. ROC analysis was performed for the SII values of each technique, the adrenal-to-spleen SI ratio of 2D dGRE technique at 3 T, and the fat fraction values of the 3D VIBE-Dixon technique to identify the optimal threshold for differentiation of adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas.

RESULTS

For detection of microscopic fat, the mean SII value of 2D dGRE technique at 1.5 T was significantly higher than that of the chemical shift imaging techniques at 3 T (p = 0.001). For discrimination of adenomas from non-adenomas, the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval values of 2D dGRE technique at 1.5 T and 2D dGRE, 3D VIBE, 3D VIBE-Dixon techniques at 3 T were calculated as 1.00 (1.00-1.00), 0.991 (0.978-1.00), 0.999 (0.995-1.00), 0.993 (0.979-1.00), respectively, for the SII.

CONCLUSION

Chemical shift MRI at 1.5 T using the 2D dGRE technique provided the most accurate differentiation between adenomas and non-adenomas. However, there was no statistically significant difference between chemical shift imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T.

摘要

目的

比较三种化学位移 MRI 技术(二维(2D)双梯度回波(dGRE)、三维容积内插扰相梯度回波(VIBE)和三维 VIBE-Dixon)在 3T 和 1.5T 下的 2D dGRE 技术,以评估它们检测肾上腺腺瘤中微观脂肪的能力,并区分腺瘤和非腺瘤。

方法

78 例患者共 97 个病灶(78 个腺瘤,19 个非腺瘤)均行 1.5T 和 3T 化学位移 MRI。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验确定各技术的信号强度指数(SII)值是否存在显著差异,以评估其检测肾上腺腺瘤中微观脂肪的能力。对各技术的 SII 值、3T 下 2D dGRE 技术的肾上腺-脾脏 SI 比值以及 3D VIBE-Dixon 技术的脂肪分数值进行 ROC 分析,以确定区分肾上腺腺瘤和非腺瘤的最佳阈值。

结果

在检测微观脂肪方面,1.5T 下 2D dGRE 技术的平均 SII 值明显高于 3T 下的化学位移成像技术(p=0.001)。在区分腺瘤和非腺瘤方面,1.5T 下 2D dGRE 技术和 2D dGRE、3D VIBE、3D VIBE-Dixon 技术的曲线下面积(AUC)和 95%置信区间值分别为 1.00(1.00-1.00)、0.991(0.978-1.00)、0.999(0.995-1.00)、0.993(0.979-1.00)。

结论

1.5T 下使用 2D dGRE 技术的化学位移 MRI 技术在区分腺瘤和非腺瘤方面提供了最准确的结果。然而,1.5T 和 3T 下的化学位移成像技术之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验