Department of Urban and Rural Planning, College of Architecture, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, People's Republic of China.
Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Sep;22(13):2436-2447. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000910. Epub 2019 May 27.
To determine whether neighbourhood supermarket and convenience store availability and broader built environment context are associated with food purchasing behaviour in a national population.
We used observational data to perform a cross-sectional study of food purchases for US households in 2010. We used three-level mixed-effect regression models to determine whether the associations between the number of neighbourhood supermarkets and convenience stores and the self-reported annual household expenditures for fruits and vegetables were affected by regional destination accessibility, neighbourhood destination diversity, availability of neighbourhood destinations and neighbourhood street connectivity.
Metropolitan statistical areas (n 378) in the USA.
Households (n 22 448).
When we controlled for broader built environment context, there was no significant association between availability of neighbourhood supermarkets and expenditures on fruits and vegetables; instead, we observed an inverse association between the number of convenience stores and expenditures for fruits (P = 0·001). The broader built environment context was associated with food purchase, although the magnitude was small: (i) higher regional destination accessibility was associated with higher expenditures for fruits (P < 0·001); (ii) higher neighbourhood destination diversity was associated with lower expenditures for vegetables (P = 0·002); and (iii) higher neighbourhood street connectivity was associated with higher expenditures for fruits (P < 0·001).
The broader built environment factors contributed to understanding how people use neighbourhood food stores. However, there was only a small relationship between the broader environment context and fruit and vegetable expenditures. Policy interventions that focus exclusively on increasing the availability of neighbourhood supermarkets likely will not promote fruit and vegetable consumption.
确定社区超市和便利店的可达性以及更广泛的建成环境背景是否与全国人口的食品购买行为有关。
我们使用观察性数据对 2010 年美国家庭的食品购买情况进行了横断面研究。我们使用三级混合效应回归模型,以确定社区超市和便利店数量与自我报告的年度家庭水果和蔬菜支出之间的关联是否受到区域目的地可达性、邻里目的地多样性、邻里目的地可用性和邻里街道连通性的影响。
美国大都市统计区(n=378)。
家庭(n=22448)。
当我们控制更广泛的建成环境背景时,社区超市的可达性与水果和蔬菜的支出之间没有显著关联;相反,我们观察到便利店数量与水果支出呈反比关系(P=0.001)。更广泛的建成环境背景与食品购买有关,尽管程度较小:(i)较高的区域目的地可达性与水果支出较高有关(P<0.001);(ii)较高的邻里目的地多样性与蔬菜支出较低有关(P=0.002);(iii)较高的邻里街道连通性与水果支出较高有关(P<0.001)。
更广泛的建成环境因素有助于理解人们如何使用邻里食品店。然而,更广泛的环境背景与水果和蔬菜支出之间只有很小的关系。专注于增加社区超市可达性的政策干预措施可能不会促进水果和蔬菜的消费。