• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康传播中的文化适宜性:综述与修订框架

Cultural Appropriateness in Health Communication: A Review and A Revised Framework.

作者信息

Tan Naomi Q P, Cho Hyunyi

机构信息

a School of Communication, The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2019;24(5):492-502. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1620382. Epub 2019 May 28.

DOI:10.1080/10810730.2019.1620382
PMID:31132946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7101074/
Abstract

A revised framework for cultural appropriateness is offered on the basis of a systematic review of operationalizations in 44 cancer screening interventions for Asian Americans. Studies commonly conveyed the epidemiological bases of the intervention (97.7%) and used the language of the population (95.5%). Less commonly reported were strategies central to health communication: cultural features of the intervention messages (77.3%) and the cultural beliefs and values that the intervention focused on (43.2%). Few used cultural tailoring (4.5%) and none aimed to address acculturation or cultural identity. The theoretical framework most frequently used was the health belief model (27.3%) which does not explain the role of culture. More studies focused on cultural barriers (20.5%) than cultural strengths (9.1%). Our revised framework comprises six cultural appropriateness strategies of cultural identity, linguistic, perceptual features, content, constituent-involving, and socioeconomic context-adaptive. It prioritizes cultural identity to recognize the dynamics within racial ethnic groups and to inform adaptive efforts for cultural appropriateness. It emphasizes examining cultural strengths that can facilitate change, as well as reducing cultural barriers. Future research and action should address the disparities in extant health disparities research in which theory and methods are underdeveloped and underutilized for Asian Americans.

摘要

在对44项针对亚裔美国人的癌症筛查干预措施的实施情况进行系统综述的基础上,提出了一个关于文化适宜性的修订框架。研究通常传达了干预措施的流行病学依据(97.7%)并使用了目标人群的语言(95.5%)。较少被报道的是健康传播的核心策略:干预信息的文化特征(77.3%)以及干预措施所关注的文化信仰和价值观(43.2%)。很少有人采用文化调适(4.5%),且没有人旨在解决文化适应或文化认同问题。最常使用的理论框架是健康信念模型(27.3%),但该模型并未解释文化的作用。关注文化障碍(20.5%)的研究比关注文化优势(9.1%)的研究更多。我们修订后的框架包括文化认同、语言、感知特征、内容、利益相关者参与和社会经济背景适应这六种文化适宜性策略。它将文化认同置于优先地位,以认识种族群体内部的动态变化,并为文化适宜性的适应性努力提供信息。它强调审视有助于改变的文化优势,以及减少文化障碍。未来的研究和行动应解决现有健康差异研究中的差距,在这些研究中,理论和方法对于亚裔美国人来说发展不足且未得到充分利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0ed/7101074/4ea9beb820d8/nihms-1529858-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0ed/7101074/2e50f5df205d/nihms-1529858-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0ed/7101074/4ea9beb820d8/nihms-1529858-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0ed/7101074/2e50f5df205d/nihms-1529858-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0ed/7101074/4ea9beb820d8/nihms-1529858-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural Appropriateness in Health Communication: A Review and A Revised Framework.健康传播中的文化适宜性:综述与修订框架
J Health Commun. 2019;24(5):492-502. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1620382. Epub 2019 May 28.
2
Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.界定文化能力:解决健康及医疗保健领域种族/族裔差异问题的实用框架。
Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):293-302. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.293.
3
Culture in Cancer Survivorship Interventions for Asian Americans: A Systematic Review and Critical Analyses.针对亚裔美国人的癌症幸存者干预措施中的文化因素:一项系统综述与批判性分析
Asian Am J Psychol. 2021 Mar;12(1):65-75. doi: 10.1037/aap0000225. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
4
5
Barriers to mammography screening among racial and ethnic minority women.少数民族和种族女性进行乳房 X 光筛查的障碍。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112494. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112494. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Health communication with Chinese Americans about type 2 diabetes.与美籍华人进行 2 型糖尿病的健康沟通。
Diabetes Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;38(1):67-76. doi: 10.1177/0145721711428774. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
8
Are psychosocial interventions targeting older African American cancer survivors culturally appropriate?: a review of the literature.针对老年非裔美国癌症幸存者的心理社会干预措施在文化上是否合适?:文献综述。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):E12-23. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31821e0b11.
9
The importance of cultural competency in general pediatrics.文化能力在普通儿科学中的重要性。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Dec;20(6):711-8. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328317efff.
10
Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology: a theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groups.文化定位和共享决策技术定制:提高文化多元化群体中患者决策辅助工具有效性的理论框架。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;105:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving quality and safety of cancer care for people from ethnic minority backgrounds: what do consumers want?提高少数族裔背景人群癌症护理的质量和安全性:消费者想要什么?
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 27;33(7):635. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09665-6.
2
Non-randomised prospective clinical trial to improve follow-up adherence, survivorship knowledge and late effects documentation at a childhood cancer clinic in Western Kenya: a study protocol.在肯尼亚西部一家儿童癌症诊所开展的非随机前瞻性临床试验,旨在提高随访依从性、生存知识及晚期效应记录:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e096741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096741.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position.两个从属轴:一种新的种族地位模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 May;112(5):696-717. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000080. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
2
A Community-Based Randomized Trial of Hepatitis B Screening Among High-Risk Vietnamese Americans.一项针对高危美籍越南人的社区乙肝筛查随机试验。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Mar;107(3):433-440. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303600. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
3
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Chinese Americans: Efficacy of Lay Health Worker Outreach and Print Materials.
From barriers to participation: co-creating an effective reminder letter for breast cancer screening among underserved women in Flanders.
从参与障碍入手:共同为弗拉芒地区服务不足的女性创建一份有效的乳腺癌筛查提醒信。
Arch Public Health. 2025 May 14;83(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01591-7.
4
Shaping and Designing Health Communication Messages Around Culture in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.围绕沙特阿拉伯王国的文化塑造和设计健康传播信息。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63874. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63874. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Understanding child development and care integrality: Primary Health Care doctors and nurses' view.理解儿童发展和关怀的整体性:基层医疗保健医生和护士的观点。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2024 Apr 29;42:e2023127. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023127. eCollection 2024.
6
RACares: a conceptual design to guide mHealth relational agent development based on a systematic review.RACares:基于系统综述指导移动健康关系代理开发的概念设计。
Mhealth. 2024 Jan 8;10:11. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-23-46. eCollection 2024.
7
Dialysis decision-making process by Chinese American patients at an urban, academic medical center: a retrospective chart review.中美透析患者在城市学术医疗中心的透析决策过程:回顾性图表分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 25;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01357-y.
8
Fertility education: recommendations for developing and implementing tools to improve fertility literacy†.生育力教育:制定和实施工具以提高生育力知识素养的建议†。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Feb 1;39(2):293-302. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead253.
9
Exploring determinants of formation of cognitive anchors from altruistic messages: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach.从利他主义信息中探索认知锚定形成的决定因素:模糊 DEMATEL 方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 6;18(11):e0293841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293841. eCollection 2023.
10
Community Member and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Communication With Chinese American Patients With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.社区成员和医疗保健提供者对与华裔美国癌症患者沟通的看法:一项定性研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Dec;18(12):e1927-e1934. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00047. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
结直肠癌筛查与华裔美国人:外展工作者宣传及印刷材料的效果
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):e67-e76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
4
Health Examination Is Not a Priority for Less Acculturated Asian Americans.健康检查对文化适应程度较低的亚裔美国人来说并非优先事项。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Oct 31. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0306-0.
5
Lay health educators increase colorectal cancer screening among Hmong Americans: A cluster randomized controlled trial.非专业健康教育工作者提高了美籍苗族人群的结直肠癌筛查率:一项整群随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2017 Jan 1;123(1):98-106. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30265. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
6
Determinants of cancer screening in Asian-Americans.亚裔美国人癌症筛查的决定因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Aug;27(8):989-98. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0776-8. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
7
Effectiveness of an Ongoing, Community-Based Breast Cancer Prevention Program for Korean American Women.一项针对韩裔美国女性的持续社区乳腺癌预防项目的成效
Health Soc Work. 2016 Feb;41(1):51-9. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlv086.
8
mHealth Pilot Study: Text Messaging Intervention to Promote HPV Vaccination.移动健康试点研究:通过短信干预促进人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种
Am J Health Behav. 2016 Jan;40(1):67-76. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.1.8.
9
Effectiveness of Lay Health Worker Outreach in Reducing Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vietnamese Americans.非专业健康工作者外展服务在减少美籍越南人结直肠癌筛查差异方面的有效性。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Oct;105(10):2083-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302713. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
10
Increasing cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese Americans: a community-based intervention trial.提高美籍越南人宫颈癌筛查率:一项基于社区的干预试验。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 May;26(2 Suppl):36-52. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0064.