• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物力学研究:确定拧入式缝合锚钉的最佳插入角度——“死人角”是否正确?

Biomechanical study: determining the optimum insertion angle for screw-in suture anchors-is deadman's angle correct?

作者信息

Green Robert N, Donaldson Oliver W, Dafydd Meilyr, Evans Sam L, Kulkarni Rohit

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Northern Deanery, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England.

Yeovil District Hospital, Yeovil, England.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec;30(12):1535-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.010
PMID:25218007
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of the insertion angle and the angle of applied load on the pullout strength of screw-in suture anchors.

METHODS

Screw-in metallic suture anchors were inserted into a 10-lb/cu ft synthetic cancellous bone block at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° to the surface. The suture pull angle was then varied in 30° increments between 0° and 180°. Five constructs were tested to failure (anchor pullout) for each combination of angles using a Zwick tensile testing machine (Zwick Roell, Ulm, Germany).

RESULTS

There were a total of 25 combinations. The greatest pullout strength was seen with a suture anchor inserted at 90° to the bone block with a pull angle of 90° to the bone (mean, 306 N; standard deviation [SD], 9 N). The weakest pullout strength was seen with a suture anchor inserted at 30° with the angle of pull at 120° (i.e., opposite to the direction of insertion of the anchor) (mean, 97 N; SD, 11 N). A simulated deadman's angle of 45° with an angle of pull of 150° produced a pullout strength of 127 N (SD, 4 N). The pullout strengths for each insertion angle were greatest when the angle of pull was similar to the angle of insertion (P < .0001, repeated-measures analysis of variance).

CONCLUSIONS

The angle of applied load to a suture anchor and the insertion angle significantly influence the biomechanical pullout strength of screw-in suture anchors. The insertion angle of the suture anchor should replicate the angle of applied load to ensure the optimum pullout strength.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The screw-in anchor insertion angle and angle of applied load may have an influence on pullout strength.

摘要

目的

评估拧入式缝线锚钉的插入角度和施加载荷角度对其拔出强度的影响。

方法

将拧入式金属缝线锚钉以与表面呈30°、45°、60°和90°的角度插入到密度为10磅/立方英尺的合成松质骨块中。然后将缝线牵拉角度在0°至180°之间以30°的增量进行变化。使用Zwick拉伸试验机(德国乌尔姆市的Zwick Roell公司)对每种角度组合进行五次构建测试直至失效(锚钉拔出)。

结果

共有25种组合。当缝线锚钉与骨块呈90°插入且牵拉角度与骨呈90°时,拔出强度最大(均值为306 N;标准差[SD]为9 N)。当缝线锚钉以30°插入且牵拉角度为120°(即与锚钉插入方向相反)时,拔出强度最弱(均值为97 N;SD为11 N)。呈45°的模拟钝角且牵拉角度为150°时,拔出强度为127 N(SD为4 N)。当牵拉角度与插入角度相似时,每种插入角度的拔出强度最大(P < 0.0001,重复测量方差分析)。

结论

施加于缝线锚钉的载荷角度和插入角度显著影响拧入式缝线锚钉的生物力学拔出强度。缝线锚钉的插入角度应与施加载荷角度一致,以确保最佳拔出强度。

临床意义

拧入式锚钉的插入角度和施加载荷角度可能会对拔出强度产生影响。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical study: determining the optimum insertion angle for screw-in suture anchors-is deadman's angle correct?生物力学研究:确定拧入式缝合锚钉的最佳插入角度——“死人角”是否正确?
Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec;30(12):1535-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
2
The effect of insertion angle on the pullout strength of threaded suture anchors: a validation of the deadman theory.插入角度对带螺纹缝线锚钉拔出强度的影响:“死人理论”的验证
Arthroscopy. 2014 Aug;30(8):900-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
The Effect of Suture Anchor Insertion Angle on Calcaneus Pullout Strength: Challenging the Deadman's Angle.缝合锚钉植入角度对跟骨拔出强度的影响:挑战传统角度。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Oct;10(5):411-414. doi: 10.1177/1938640016679705. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of a 4.75-mm and a 5.5-mm bone anchor at two insertion angles using one and two strands of suture.一种 4.75 毫米和一种 5.5 毫米骨锚在两种不同插入角度下,采用单股和双股缝线的生物力学评估。
Am J Vet Res. 2022 May 21;83(7):ajvr.21.05.0065. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.21.05.0065.
5
A biomechanical study on suture anchor insertion angle: Which is better, 90° or 45°?缝线锚钉植入角度的生物力学研究:90°还是45°更好?
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
6
Pullout Strength of All-Suture Anchors: Effect of the Insertion and Traction Angle-A Biomechanical Study.全缝线锚钉拔出强度:进钉角度和牵引角度的影响——一项生物力学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2784-2795. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
7
When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study.当死人理论遇到足迹去皮质化:缝线锚定的生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 27;14(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7.
8
The effect of the angle of suture anchor insertion on fixation failure at the tendon-suture interface after rotator cuff repair: deadman's angle revisited.肩袖修复术后缝线锚钉植入角度对肌腱-缝线界面固定失败的影响:重新审视死亡角
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jun;25(6):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.021. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
9
All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.全缝线锚钉大小和钻孔角度对猪模型下胸肌二头肌肌腱固定术失效负荷的影响:一项生物力学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 23;25(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07503-0.
10
Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.肩袖和关节盂锚定物拔出强度的生物力学分析:2011 年更新。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jul;27(7):895-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of suture anchor type, eyelet configuration, and loading condition on suture failure: An in vitro study.缝线锚钉类型、小孔构造及加载条件对缝线失效的影响:一项体外研究。
Vet Surg. 2025 Aug;54(6):1229-1238. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14231. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术中缝线锚钉拔出的危险因素及相应处理
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 21;11(22):6870. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226870.
3
Rotator cuff repair techniques: Current concepts.肩袖修复技术:当前概念
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Mar 17;17:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.03.006. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Navigation-assisted suture anchor insertion for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.导航辅助缝合锚钉置入术在关节镜下肩袖修复中的应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 29;20(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3021-2.
5
Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.传统肩袖与全缝线锚钉的比较-在无限循环模型中关注置入角度的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225648. eCollection 2019.
6
Medialization of medial row anchor via the Nevasier portal yield enhanced footprint and outcomes in medium-to-large rotator cuff tears.经 Nevasier 入路行内侧排锚钉固定可增加中等至巨大肩袖撕裂的锚钉面积和改善疗效。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3989-3996. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05641-w. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
7
When deadman theory meets footprint decortication: a suture anchor biomechanical study.当死人理论遇到足迹去皮质化:缝线锚定的生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 27;14(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1209-7.
8
Biomechanical testing of trans-humeral all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.用于肩袖修复的经肱骨全缝线锚钉的生物力学测试。
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 May;11(1 Suppl):77-85. doi: 10.1177/1758573218779078. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
9
Effect of anchor threads on the pullout strength: A biomechanical study.锚定线对拔出强度的影响:一项生物力学研究。
J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):878-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.008. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Anchoring structure of the calvarial periosteum revealed by focused ion beam/scanning electron microscope tomography.聚焦离子束/扫描电子显微镜断层扫描揭示的颅盖骨骨膜的锚定结构。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 2;5:17511. doi: 10.1038/srep17511.