Division of Vaccine Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
Front Immunol. 2019 May 10;10:1025. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01025. eCollection 2019.
It is now well-accepted that Fc-mediated effector functions, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), can contribute to vaccine-elicited protection as well as post-infection control of HIV viremia. This picture was derived using a wide array of ADCC assays, no two of which are strictly comparable, and none of which is qualified at the clinical laboratory level. An earlier comparative study of assay protocols showed that while data from different ADCC assay formats were often correlated, they remained distinct in terms of target cells and the epitopes and antigen(s) available for recognition by antibodies, the effector cells, and the readout of cytotoxicity. This initial study warrants expanded analyses of the relationships among all current assay formats to determine where they detect overlapping activities and where they do not. Here we summarize knowns and unknowns of assaying ADCC against HIV-1.
现在人们普遍认为,Fc 介导的效应功能,包括抗体依赖性细胞毒性 (ADCC),可以有助于疫苗诱导的保护以及感染后控制 HIV 病毒血症。这一观点是通过广泛的 ADCC 检测方法得出的,这些方法没有两个是完全可比的,也没有一个是在临床实验室水平上得到验证的。早期对检测方案的比较研究表明,虽然来自不同 ADCC 检测方法的数据通常是相关的,但它们在靶细胞以及抗体、效应细胞可识别的表位和抗原(s),以及细胞毒性的检测方面仍然存在差异。这项初步研究需要对所有当前检测方法之间的关系进行更广泛的分析,以确定它们在哪些方面检测到重叠的活性,在哪些方面没有。在这里,我们总结了针对 HIV-1 的 ADCC 检测的已知和未知因素。