Al-Batayneh O B, Bani Hmood E I, Al-Khateeb S N
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, PO Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Feb;21(1):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00451-7. Epub 2019 May 27.
To compare the effects of a fluoride dentifrice alone, versus a topical CPP-ACP crème used as a dentifrice, versus the combination of both agents (fluoride dentifrice followed by CPP-ACP crème) on early caries lesions (ECL) in primary anterior teeth of children over a 6-month period.
In this single blinded randomised clinical trial, children (n = 114, aged 4-5 years) with high caries risk and who had at least one ECL (ICDAS 2) on their primary anterior teeth were allocated to three groups. Subjects used different agents twice daily: fluoride dentifrice (500 ppm F, n = 42), CPP-ACP crème (10% w/v, n = 35), and the fluoride dentifrice followed by CPP-ACP crème (n = 37). Changes in lesions were tracked using QLF, comparing the baseline situation to 3 and 6 months of treatment.
QLF changes consistent with mineral gain (∆F/fluorescence, lesion area) occurred in all three groups (baseline versus 3 months or 6 months, p ≤ 0.05 for all three groups). Differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
The topical CPP-ACP crème used alone gave effects similar to the fluoride dentifrice; however, the combination of the two did not give additive benefits over either agent used in isolation.
比较单独使用含氟牙膏、将局部用酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP)乳膏用作牙膏、以及两种制剂联合使用(先使用含氟牙膏,再使用CPP-ACP乳膏)对儿童乳前牙早期龋损(ECL)在6个月期间的影响。
在这项单盲随机临床试验中,将高龋风险且乳前牙至少有一处ECL(国际龋病检测和评估系统[ICDAS] 2级)的儿童(n = 114,年龄4 - 5岁)分为三组。受试者每天使用不同制剂两次:含氟牙膏(氟含量500 ppm,n = 42)、CPP-ACP乳膏(10% w/v,n = 35)、以及先使用含氟牙膏再使用CPP-ACP乳膏(n = 37)。使用定量光导荧光法(QLF)追踪病损变化,将基线情况与治疗3个月和6个月时的情况进行比较。
三组均出现了与矿物质增加相符的QLF变化(ΔF/荧光,病损面积)(基线与3个月或6个月相比,三组p均≤0.05)。治疗组之间的差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。
单独使用局部用CPP-ACP乳膏产生的效果与含氟牙膏相似;然而,两者联合使用并未比单独使用任何一种制剂带来额外益处。