Neligan Aidan, Noyce Alastair John, Gosavi Tushar Divakar, Shorvon Simon D, Köhler Sebastian, Walker Matthew C
Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Homerton Row, London, England.
University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):897-905. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1268.
Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Since the late 1990s, a more aggressive management of prolonged convulsive seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes has been advocated.
To determine if convulsive SE mortality has decreased during a time of increasing advocacy for out-of-hospital treatment and escalating and earlier treatment protocols for prolonged seizures and SE.
This systemic review and meta-analysis on studies focused on the mortality of convulsive status epilepticus was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 2017.
Studies were excluded if they had fewer than 30 participants (<20 for refractory SE), were limited to SE of single specific etiology or an evaluation of a single treatment modality, or were studies of nonconvulsive SE.
Data were abstracted and their quality was assessed via a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale independently by 2 reviewers (A.N. and T.D.G.) using the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality or 30-day case fatality expressed as proportional mortality.
Sixty-one studies were included in the analysis. The pooled mortality ratios were 15.9% (95% CI, 12.7-19.2) for adult studies, 13.0% (95% CI, 7.2-19.0) for all-age population studies, 3.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-5.2%) for pediatric studies, and 17.3% (95% CI, 9.8-24.7) for refractory SE studies, with very high between-study heterogeneity. We found no evidence of a change in prognosis over time nor by the definition of SE used.
The mortality of convulsive SE is higher in adults than in children and there was no evidence for improved survival over time. Although there are many explanations for these findings, they can be explained by aetiology of SE being the major determinant of mortality. However, there are potential confounders, including differences in case ascertainment and study heterogeneity. This meta-analysis highlights the need for strict international guidelines for the study of this condition.
癫痫持续状态(SE)与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。自20世纪90年代末以来,一直提倡对持续超过5分钟的长时间惊厥性癫痫发作进行更积极的管理。
确定在对院外治疗的倡导增加以及对长时间癫痫发作和SE的治疗方案不断升级和提前的时期内,惊厥性SE的死亡率是否有所下降。
通过检索1990年1月1日至2017年6月30日期间的MEDLINE、Embase、PsychINFO、CINAHL Plus和Cochrane系统评价数据库,对关注惊厥性癫痫持续状态死亡率的研究进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析。
如果研究参与者少于30人(难治性SE少于20人)、仅限于单一特定病因的SE或单一治疗方式的评估,或为非惊厥性SE的研究,则将其排除。
数据由两名评审员(A.N.和T.D.G.)根据流行病学观察性研究的荟萃分析(MOOSE)指南,通过改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表独立提取并评估其质量。数据使用随机效应模型进行汇总。
主要结局指标为住院死亡率或30天病死率,以比例死亡率表示。
分析纳入了61项研究。成人研究的汇总死亡率为15.9%(95%CI,12.7 - 19.2),全年龄人群研究为13.0%(95%CI,7.2 - 19.0),儿科研究为3.6%(95%CI,2.0% - 5.2%),难治性SE研究为17.3%(95%CI,9.8 - 24.7),研究间异质性非常高。我们没有发现随时间或所使用的SE定义而预后发生变化的证据。
惊厥性SE的死亡率在成人中高于儿童,且没有证据表明随时间推移生存率有所改善。尽管对这些发现有多种解释,但它们可以由SE的病因是死亡率的主要决定因素来解释。然而,存在潜在的混杂因素,包括病例确定的差异和研究异质性。这项荟萃分析强调了针对这种情况的研究需要严格的国际指南。