Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200, First St. SW, 55905 Rochester, MN, United States.
Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;47(4):266-271. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 25.
We compared the ability of intracranial high-resolution vessel wall imaging (VWI) without gadolinium and 3-D time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MRA techniques to characterize intracranial arterial stenosis and arterial wall plaque consistent with atherosclerotic plaque.
Consecutive intracranial VWI examinations performed within 2 months of a 3D-TOF exam with at least 1 noted plaque was included. Examinations assessed 17 vessel segments for plaque and diameters of stenotic and normal segments using double oblique reformatted images. Results were compared with the VWI and 3D-TOF exams considered the reference standard for plaque and luminal stenosis, respectively.
Assessed segments totaled 286 from 17 patients. Proximal segment sensitivity and specificity for luminal stenosis detection with VWI was 92.5% and 82.1%, respectively, whereas for assessing plaque with 3D-TOF it was 59.4% and 98.3%, respectively. The mean intra-rater difference in luminal diameter measurements between VWI and 3D-TOF at normal segments and at the area of maximal stenosis was 0.02mm (SD 0.51mm) and 0.08mm (SD 0.66mm), respectively.
Intracranial VWI demonstrated reasonably high sensitivity and specificity for luminal stenosis assessment using 3D-TOF as a reference standard, while 3D-TOF demonstrated low sensitivity for plaque detection. Our results suggest that VWI can be used for simultaneous assessment of luminal stenosis and plaque in the intracranial arteries.
我们比较了颅内高分辨率血管壁成像(VWI)和 3D 时间飞跃(3D-TOF)MRA 技术在颅内动脉狭窄和动脉壁斑块特征方面的能力,这些斑块与动脉粥样硬化斑块一致。
纳入了在 3D-TOF 检查后 2 个月内进行的颅内 VWI 检查,至少有 1 个斑块被记录。检查使用双斜位重建成像评估了 17 个血管节段的斑块和狭窄节段及正常节段的直径。结果与 VWI 和 3D-TOF 检查进行了比较,这两种检查分别被认为是斑块和管腔狭窄的参考标准。
评估的节段总计为 17 例患者的 286 个节段。VWI 对管腔狭窄检测的近端节段灵敏度和特异性分别为 92.5%和 82.1%,而 3D-TOF 对评估斑块的灵敏度和特异性分别为 59.4%和 98.3%。在正常节段和最大狭窄区域,VWI 和 3D-TOF 之间的管腔直径测量的平均组内差异分别为 0.02mm(SD 0.51mm)和 0.08mm(SD 0.66mm)。
使用 3D-TOF 作为参考标准,颅内 VWI 对管腔狭窄评估具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,而 3D-TOF 对斑块检测的灵敏度较低。我们的结果表明,VWI 可用于同时评估颅内动脉的管腔狭窄和斑块。