Nyqvist Fredrica, Nygård Mikael, Scharf Thomas
1Åbo Akademi University, Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Social Policy, Vaasa, Finland.
2Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eur J Ageing. 2018 Sep 6;16(2):133-143. doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-0487-y. eCollection 2019 Jun.
Previous research implies that the extent of welfare state regime provision plays an important indirect role in the prevalence of loneliness in later life. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the association between quality of living conditions and level of social integration indicators and the absence of loneliness in five different welfare regimes. By incorporating welfare state regimes as a proxy for societal-level features, we expanded the micro-level model of loneliness suggesting that besides individual characteristics, welfare state characteristics are also important protective factors against loneliness. The data source was from the European Social Survey round 7, 2014, from which we analysed 11,389 individuals aged 60 and over from 20 countries. The association between quality of living conditions, level of social integration variables and the absence of loneliness was analysed using multivariate logistic regression treating the welfare regime variable as a fixed effect. Our study revealed that the absence of loneliness was strongly associated with individual characteristics of older adults, including self-rated health, household size, feeling of safety, marital status, frequency of being social, as well as number of confidants. Further, the Nordic as well as Anglo-Saxon and Continental welfare regimes performed better than the Southern and Eastern regimes when it comes to the absence of loneliness. Our findings showed that different individual resources were connected to the absence of loneliness in the welfare regimes in different ways. We conclude that older people in the Nordic regime, characterised as a more socially enabling regime, are less dependent on individual resources for loneliness compared to regimes where loneliness is to a greater extent conditioned by family and other social ties.
先前的研究表明,福利国家制度的提供程度在晚年孤独感的普遍程度方面起着重要的间接作用。因此,本研究的目的是评估生活条件质量与社会融合指标水平之间的关联,以及在五种不同福利制度下孤独感的缺失情况。通过将福利国家制度作为社会层面特征的代表,我们扩展了孤独感的微观层面模型,这表明除了个人特征外,福利国家特征也是抵御孤独感的重要保护因素。数据来源是2014年欧洲社会调查第7轮,我们从中分析了来自20个国家的11389名60岁及以上的个体。使用多变量逻辑回归分析生活条件质量、社会融合变量水平与孤独感缺失之间的关联,并将福利制度变量视为固定效应。我们的研究表明,孤独感的缺失与老年人的个人特征密切相关,包括自我评定的健康状况、家庭规模、安全感、婚姻状况、社交频率以及知己数量。此外,在孤独感缺失方面,北欧以及盎格鲁 - 撒克逊和大陆福利制度比南方和东方制度表现更好。我们的研究结果表明,不同的个人资源在不同的福利制度下与孤独感的缺失以不同方式相关联。我们得出结论,与孤独感在更大程度上由家庭和其他社会关系决定的制度相比,北欧制度被视为更有利于社交的制度,在该制度下老年人对孤独感的个人资源依赖较小。