Suppr超能文献

一次模拟大规模伤亡事件分诊演习:模拟战争。

A Simulated Mass Casualty Incident Triage Exercise: SimWars.

作者信息

Bentley Suzanne, Iavicoli Laura, Boehm Lorraine, Agriantonis George, Dilos Barbara, LaMonica Julia, Smith Colleen, Wong Lillian, Lopez Tania, Galer Anju, Kessle Stuart

机构信息

Medical Director, Simulation Center, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst.

Attending Physician, Emergency Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2019 May 10;15:10823. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10823.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This multipatient simulation exercise encompasses triage by hospital medical providers during a mass casualty incident (MCI) involving gas line explosion with building collapse. The SimWars format allows two teams to participate in identical simulations coupled with active audience observation, followed by facilitated group discussion. The exercise requires real-time knowledge application of MCI management and helps learners develop a framework for rapidly classifying and dispositioning MCI patients.

METHODS

Two teams of provider pairs completed MCI triage of 12 simulated patients in 8 minutes with an objective of quickly and accurately dispositioning within hospital bed availability. Participants included emergency medicine and surgery physicians, with active observation by mixed provider audiences. Observers completed a checklist per patient (category: urgent/emergent/not emergent, disposition: bed type/location). At simulation conclusion, a 45-minute facilitated discussion compared observers' self-assessment of MCI patient management with the simulation teams' decisions. Finally, an expert panel discussed management decisions and MCI triage pearls.

RESULTS

Team performances ( = 4) and audience responses ( = 164) were similar on seven of 12 patients, allowing robust discussion. Participants completed an evaluation at exercise conclusion; 37% reported good/excellent ability to accomplish MCI initial triage and disposition before this exercise compared to 100% after, a statistically significant 63% increase. All postsurvey respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the exercise would change their MCI clinical practice.

DISCUSSION

The two-team format allows comparison of how different teams handle MCI triage, and active observation allows comparison of audience and team decision making.

摘要

引言

本次多患者模拟演练涵盖了医院医疗人员在涉及燃气管道爆炸及建筑物倒塌的大规模伤亡事件(MCI)中的分诊工作。SimWars形式允许两个团队参与相同的模拟,并伴有观众现场观察,随后进行引导式小组讨论。该演练要求实时应用MCI管理知识,并帮助学习者建立一个快速对MCI患者进行分类和处置的框架。

方法

两组医疗人员搭档在8分钟内完成了对12名模拟患者的MCI分诊,目标是在医院床位可用的情况下快速准确地进行处置。参与者包括急诊医学和外科医生,并有混合医疗人员组成的观众进行现场观察。观察员为每位患者填写一份清单(类别:紧急/急重/非紧急,处置:床位类型/位置)。在模拟结束时,进行了45分钟的引导式讨论,将观察员对MCI患者管理的自我评估与模拟团队的决策进行了比较。最后,一个专家小组讨论了管理决策和MCI分诊要点。

结果

在12名患者中的7名患者身上,团队表现(n = 4)和观众反应(n = 164)相似,从而能够进行充分的讨论。参与者在演练结束时完成了一项评估;37%的人报告说在本次演练之前完成MCI初始分诊和处置的能力为良好/优秀,而在演练之后这一比例为100%,有统计学意义的63%的增长。所有调查后的受访者都同意或强烈同意该演练会改变他们在MCI方面的临床实践。

讨论

两队形式允许比较不同团队如何处理MCI分诊,而现场观察则允许比较观众和团队的决策过程。

相似文献

3
8
Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.电子与人工批量伤亡事件分诊的比较
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Jun;33(3):273-278. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1800033X. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The PEARLS Healthcare Debriefing Tool.PEARLS医疗汇报工具
Acad Med. 2018 Feb;93(2):336. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002035.
4
Improving Team Performance Through Simulation-Based Learning.通过基于模拟的学习提高团队绩效。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;50(5):967-987. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.05.008.
6
Mass casualty incidents - time to engage.批量伤员事件——是时候参与了。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Feb 3;11:8. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0064-7. eCollection 2016.
10
Teamwork training improves the clinical care of trauma patients.团队合作培训提高创伤患者的临床护理水平。
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验