Surgical Oncology Miami Cancer Institute, 8900 N Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
General Surgery Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06757-3. Epub 2019 May 28.
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has proven advantages over its open counterpart and is becoming more frequently performed around the world. It still remains a difficult operation due to the retroperitoneal location of the pancreas and limited experience and training with the procedure. In addition, complications such as bleeding or postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remain a problem. A standardized approach to LDP with stepwise graded compression technique for pancreatic transection has been utilized at a single center, and we sought to describe the technique and determine the outcomes.
A review of all patients undergoing LDP by a clockwise approach including the graded compression technique from August 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017 was performed. An external audit was performed by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group.
Overall, 260 patients with a mean age and a BMI of 62.3 and 28, respectively, underwent LDP using this technique. Mean operative time and blood loss were 183 min and 248 mL, respectively,. Hand-assisted method and conversion to open were both 5%. Major morbidity and mortality were 9.2% and 0.4%, respectively,. POPF was noted in 8.1%. The technical steps include (1) mobilization of the splenic flexure of the colon and exposure of the pancreas, (2) dissection along the inferior edge of the pancreas and choosing the site for pancreatic division, (3) pancreatic parenchymal division using a progressive stepwise compression technique with staple line reinforcement, (4) ligation of the splenic vein and artery, (5) dissection along the superior edge of the pancreas and residual posterior attachments, and (6) mobilization of the spleen and specimen removal.
LDP with a clockwise approach for dissection, combined with the progressive stepwise compression technique for pancreatic transection, resulted in excellent outcomes including a very low POPF rate.
腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LDP)已被证明优于开放手术,并且在全球范围内越来越多地进行。由于胰腺的腹膜后位置以及对该手术的经验和培训有限,它仍然是一项困难的手术。此外,出血或术后胰瘘(POPF)等并发症仍然是一个问题。在一个中心,采用逐步分级压缩技术对 LDP 进行了标准化处理,我们试图描述该技术并确定其结果。
对 2008 年 8 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间采用顺时针入路包括分级压缩技术进行 LDP 的所有患者进行了回顾性分析。荷兰胰腺肿瘤组进行了外部审核。
总体而言,260 例患者的平均年龄和 BMI 分别为 62.3 岁和 28,使用该技术进行了 LDP。平均手术时间和出血量分别为 183 分钟和 248 毫升,手助方法和转为开放性手术的比例均为 5%。主要发病率和死亡率分别为 9.2%和 0.4%,POPF 发生率为 8.1%。技术步骤包括:(1)结肠脾曲的游离和胰腺的暴露;(2)沿着胰腺下边缘进行解剖并选择胰腺分割部位;(3)使用渐进式逐步压缩技术进行胰腺实质分割,并用钉线加固吻合线;(4)结扎脾静脉和动脉;(5)沿着胰腺上边缘和残余的后附着处进行解剖;(6)脾的游离和标本的取出。
顺时针入路进行解剖,结合渐进式逐步压缩技术进行胰腺横断,可获得出色的结果,包括极低的 POPF 发生率。