University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut.
Vicerrectorado de Investigacion, Universidad SanIgnacio de Loyola (USIL), Lima, Peru.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1571-1581. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15966. Epub 2019 May 29.
To assess adverse effects of pharmacologic antidepressants for treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults 65 years of age or older.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Specialist or generalist outpatient setting, rehabilitation facility, and nursing facilities.
Persons 65 years and older with MDD.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), bupropion, mirtazapine, trazodone, vilazodone, or vortioxetine compared with another antidepressant, placebo, or nonpharmacologic therapy.
Adverse events, arrhythmias, cognitive impairment, falls, fractures, hospitalization, mortality, QTc prolongation, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events.
Nineteen randomized controlled trials and two observational studies were included. Most studies evaluated treatment of the acute phase (<12 wk) of MDD of moderate severity. SSRIs led to a statistically similar frequency of overall adverse events vs placebo (moderate strength of evidence [SOE]), but SNRIs caused more overall adverse events vs placebo (high SOE) during the acute treatment phase. Both SSRIs and SNRIs led to more study withdrawals due to adverse events vs placebo (SSRIs low SOE; SNRIs moderate SOE). Duloxetine led to a more falls vs placebo (moderate SOE) during 24 weeks of acute and continuation treatment of MDD.
In patients 65 years of age or older with MDD, treatment of the acute phase of MDD with SNRIs, but not SSRIs, was associated with a statistically greater number of overall adverse events vs placebo. SSRIs and SNRIs led to a greater number of study withdrawals due to adverse events vs placebo. Duloxetine increased the risk of falls that as an outcome was underreported in the literature. Few studies examined head-to-head comparisons, most trials were not powered to evaluate adverse events, and results of observational studies may be confounded. Comparative long-term studies reporting specific adverse events are needed to inform clinical decision making regarding choice of antidepressants in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1571-1581, 2019.
评估抗抑郁药治疗 65 岁及以上成年人重度抑郁症(MDD)的不良反应。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
专家或全科门诊、康复设施和护理设施。
65 岁及以上患有 MDD 的患者。
选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)、5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)、安非他酮、米氮平、曲唑酮、维拉佐酮或 vortioxetine 与另一种抗抑郁药、安慰剂或非药物治疗相比。
不良反应、心律失常、认知障碍、跌倒、骨折、住院、死亡率、QTc 延长、严重不良事件和因不良反应而停药。
共纳入 19 项随机对照试验和 2 项观察性研究。大多数研究评估了中度严重 MDD 的急性(<12 周)治疗。SSRIs 与安慰剂相比,总体不良反应的发生率相似(中等强度证据[SOE]),但 SNRIs 在急性治疗阶段引起的总体不良反应更多(高 SOE)。SSRIs 和 SNRIs 与安慰剂相比,因不良反应而导致的研究退出率更高(SSRIs 低 SOE;SNRIs 中 SOE)。度洛西汀在治疗 MDD 的急性和延续治疗 24 周期间导致跌倒的发生率高于安慰剂(中等 SOE)。
在 65 岁及以上患有 MDD 的患者中,与 SSRIs 相比,SNRIs 治疗 MDD 的急性期与安慰剂相比,总体不良反应的发生率更高。SSRIs 和 SNRIs 因不良反应导致的研究退出率高于安慰剂。度洛西汀增加了跌倒的风险,而作为结果,文献中报告的跌倒发生率较低。很少有研究比较头对头的比较,大多数试验没有足够的能力来评估不良反应,观察性研究的结果可能受到混杂因素的影响。需要进行比较长期的研究,报告特定的不良反应,以便为这一人群选择抗抑郁药提供临床决策依据。J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1571-1581, 2019.