Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Aug;9(8):883-890. doi: 10.1002/alr.22337. Epub 2019 May 29.
A nasal septal perforation (NSP) can lead to frustrating symptoms for some patients while remaining completely asymptomatic for others, without a clear mechanism differentiating them.
We applied individual computed tomography (CT)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to examine the nasal aerodynamics differences between 5 asymptomatic and 15 symptomatic NSP patients. Patients' symptoms were confirmed through interviews, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (asymptomatic, 25 ± 18.8; symptomatic, 53.7 ± 18.2), nasal obstruction symptom evaluation score (asymptomatic, 28.0 ± 32.1; symptomatic, 62.2 ± 32.2), and review of medical history.
No statistical differences were found in perforation location, size (asymptomatic, 1.94 ± 1.88 cm ; symptomatic, 1.36 ± 1.44 cm ), nasal resistance (asymptomatic, 0.059 ± 0.012 Pa·s/mL; symptomatic, 0.063 ± 0.022 Pa·s/mL), and computed flow rate shunting across the perforation (asymptomatic, 52.9 ± 30.9 mL/s; symptomatic, 27.4 ± 23.6 mL/s; p > 0.05). However, symptomatic patients had significantly higher wall shear stress (WSS) and heat flux, especially along the posterior perforation margin (WSS, 0.54 ± 0.12 vs 1.15 ± 0.49 Pa, p < 0.001; heat flux, 0.21 ± 0.05 vs 0.37 ± 0.14 W/cm , p < 0.01). A WSS cutoff at 0.72 Pa can separate asymptomatic vs symptomatic NSP with 87% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Flow visualization showed flow peaks toward the posterior margin that may be responsible for the high WSS and heat flux among symptomatic NSPs.
This study is the first CFD examination of asymptomatic and symptomatic NSP with regional aerodynamics and stress abnormalities, beyond size or location, being implicated as the mechanism behind the symptomology of NSP. This finding could serve as an objective basis for future personalized treatment decisions and optimization.
鼻中隔穿孔(NSP)可导致一些患者出现令人沮丧的症状,而另一些患者则完全无症状,其机制尚不清楚。
我们应用个体计算机断层扫描(CT)-基于计算流体动力学(CFD)来检查 5 名无症状和 15 名有症状 NSP 患者的鼻腔空气动力学差异。通过访谈、22 项 Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 评分(无症状,25 ± 18.8;有症状,53.7 ± 18.2)、鼻腔阻塞症状评估评分(无症状,28.0 ± 32.1;有症状,62.2 ± 32.2)和病史回顾来确认患者的症状。
穿孔位置、大小(无症状,1.94 ± 1.88 cm;有症状,1.36 ± 1.44 cm)、鼻腔阻力(无症状,0.059 ± 0.012 Pa·s/mL;有症状,0.063 ± 0.022 Pa·s/mL)和计算穿过穿孔的分流流量(无症状,52.9 ± 30.9 mL/s;有症状,27.4 ± 23.6 mL/s;p > 0.05)在无症状和有症状患者之间无统计学差异。然而,有症状患者的壁面切应力(WSS)和热通量明显更高,特别是在后穿孔边缘(WSS,0.54 ± 0.12 与 1.15 ± 0.49 Pa,p < 0.001;热通量,0.21 ± 0.05 与 0.37 ± 0.14 W/cm ,p < 0.01)。WSS 截断值为 0.72 Pa 可将无症状与有症状的 NSP 分开,其敏感性为 87%,特异性为 100%。流场可视化显示流向后缘的流峰,这可能是有症状 NSP 中 WSS 和热通量较高的原因。
这是首次对无症状和有症状 NSP 进行 CFD 检查,区域性空气动力学和应力异常与穿孔大小或位置无关,被认为是 NSP 症状背后的机制。这一发现可为未来的个性化治疗决策和优化提供客观依据。