Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Division of Arthroscopy, Joint Surgery and Sport Injuries, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 30;20(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2657-2.
Due to the high anatomical variability and limited visualization of the scapula, optimal screw placement for baseplate anchorage in reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is challenging. Image quality plays a key role regarding the decision of an appropriate implant position. However, these data a currently missing for rTSA and were investigated in the present study. Furthermore, the rate of required K-wire changes for the central peg as well as post-implantation inclination and version were assessed.
In ten consecutive patients (8 female, 86 years, range 74-94) with proximal humeral fracture and indication for rTSA, an intraoperative 3D-scan of the shoulder with a 3D image intensifier (Ziehm Vision FD Vario 3D© [Ziehm Imaging GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany]) was performed after resection of the humeral head. Using the Vectorvision© Software (Brainlab AG, Feldkirchen, Germany), the virtual anatomy was compared to the visible anatomical landmarks. After implantation of the baseplate, a 3D scan was performed. All 3D scans included multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and the cinemode to examine screw and baseplate placement. The rate of required K-wire changes was assessed. The intraoperative 3D image quality (modified visual analogue scale [VAS] and point system) was assessed before and after implantation of the glenoid component. Inclination and version were determined in post-implantation scans.
The virtually presented anatomical landmarks always correlated to the anatomical visible points indicating an good virtual accuracy. The central K-wire position was corrected in three cases due to a deviation from the face plane technique position. The VAS was higher for the pre-implantation MPR (6.7, range 5-8) compared to the post-implantation acquired MPR (5.1, range 4-6; p = 0.0002). The point system showed a reduced quality in all subcategories, especially regarding the grading of the articular surfaces. The preoperative (7.9, range 6-9) and post-implantation (7.9, range 6-9) cinemode displayed no significant differences (p = 0.6).
The present study underlines the need for the improvement of 3D image intensifiers algorithms to reduce artifact associated impaired image quality to enhance the benefit of real-time intraoperative 3D scans and navigation.
由于肩胛骨解剖结构的高度变异性和有限的可视化,反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)中基板锚固的最佳螺钉放置位置具有挑战性。图像质量对于决定适当的植入物位置起着关键作用。然而,目前 rTSA 缺乏这些数据,本研究对此进行了调查。此外,还评估了中央销钉所需的 K 线变化率以及植入后的倾斜度和版本。
在连续的 10 例(8 名女性,86 岁,年龄 74-94 岁)肱骨近端骨折患者中,在切除肱骨头后,使用带有 3D 图像增强器的术中 3D 肩部扫描(Ziehm Vision FD Vario 3D©[Ziehm Imaging GmbH,纽伦堡,德国])。使用 Vectorvision©软件(Brainlab AG,费尔德基希海姆,德国),将虚拟解剖结构与可见解剖标志进行比较。在基板植入后进行 3D 扫描。所有 3D 扫描均包括多平面重建(MPR)和电影模式,以检查螺钉和基板的位置。评估所需 K 线变化的发生率。在植入肩胛盂组件前后评估术中 3D 图像质量(改良视觉模拟量表[VAS]和评分系统)。在植入后扫描中确定倾斜度和版本。
虚拟呈现的解剖标志始终与指示良好虚拟准确性的解剖可见点相关。由于偏离面技术位置,三个病例中中央 K 线位置需要纠正。与植入后获得的 MPR(5.1,范围 4-6;p=0.0002)相比,植入前的 MPR 的 VAS 更高(6.7,范围 5-8)。评分系统显示,所有子类别质量均降低,尤其是关节面分级。术前(7.9,范围 6-9)和植入后(7.9,范围 6-9)电影模式无显著差异(p=0.6)。
本研究强调需要改进 3D 增强器算法,以减少与伪影相关的图像质量受损,从而提高实时术中 3D 扫描和导航的益处。