Zhao Jie, Xu Ming, Zheng Kai, Yu Xiuchun
Department of Orthopedics, The PLA 960th Hospital of China, 25#, Shifan Road, Jinan, 250031, China.
First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 4655#, Daxue Road, Jinan, 250355, China.
BMC Surg. 2019 May 30;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0519-3.
However, the application of limb salvage with joint preservation is controversial. The purpose of this study is to propose a selection strategy of joint-sparing operative procedures for humeral malignancies based on tumor origin, site and bone strength.
The medical data of 28 patients with humeral malignancies treated at our institute from January 2010 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients had a median age of 51 years (range, 8-82 years). Bone strength scoring system was utilized to evaluated bone strength of the tumor. Four joint-sparing surgical methods were performed on selected patients. Evaluation of limb function was based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system. Two-sample t-test was used to compare patient group data such as bone strength score and postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score.
The mean follow-up period for the 7 patients with primary malignancies was 45 months (range, 15-66 months). One patient died due to recurrence and lung metastasis, while the remaining 6 patients (6/7, 85.7%) survived without recurrence. For the 21 patients with metastases, 5 survived with tumors, with an average survival time of 25.8 months (range, 9-48 months). The rest died from progression of the primary tumors. The mean bone strength score for the biological reconstruction group and non-biological reconstruction group was respectively 9.7 ± 1.3 and 12.9 ± 1.2. A significant difference between the 2 groups (p < 0.05) was found. Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was respectively 27.2 ± 1.8 and 26.1 ± 1.7 for the 2 groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Non-oncological complications included fracture (1), aseptic loosening (1) and radial nerve injury (1).
Alcohol devitalized autograft replantation is applicable for diaphyseal humeral primary malignancies, with a good response to chemotherapy and a low bone strength score (≤10). In situ microwave ablation is suitable for diaphyseal and (or) metaphyseal low-grade malignant bone tumors or metastases with a low bone strength score (≤10). Intercalary prosthetic reconstruction is preferred for diaphyseal metastases with a high bone strength score (> 10).
然而,保肢并保留关节的应用存在争议。本研究的目的是基于肿瘤起源、部位和骨强度,提出一种针对肱骨恶性肿瘤的保留关节手术方案的选择策略。
回顾性分析2010年1月至2016年12月在我院接受治疗的28例肱骨恶性肿瘤患者的医疗数据。患者的中位年龄为51岁(范围8 - 82岁)。采用骨强度评分系统评估肿瘤的骨强度。对选定患者实施了四种保留关节的手术方法。基于肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分系统对肢体功能进行评估。采用两样本t检验比较患者组数据,如骨强度评分和术后肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分。
7例原发性恶性肿瘤患者的平均随访期为45个月(范围15 - 66个月)。1例患者因复发和肺转移死亡,其余6例患者(6/7,85.7%)存活且无复发。对于21例转移性肿瘤患者,5例带瘤存活,平均生存时间为25.8个月(范围9 - 48个月)。其余患者死于原发性肿瘤进展。生物重建组和非生物重建组的平均骨强度评分分别为9.7±1.3和12.9±1.2。两组间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。两组的术后平均肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分分别为27.2±1.8和26.1±1.7。两组间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。非肿瘤性并发症包括骨折(1例)、无菌性松动(1例)和桡神经损伤(1例)。
酒精灭活自体骨再植适用于肱骨干原发性恶性肿瘤,对化疗反应良好且骨强度评分低(≤10)。原位微波消融适用于肱骨干和(或)干骺端低级别恶性骨肿瘤或骨强度评分低(≤10)的转移瘤。对于骨强度评分高(>10)的肱骨干转移瘤,优先选择节段性假体置换重建。