• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地区药品不良反应监测中心报告的皮肤药品不良反应分析

Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Reported at the Regional ADR Monitoring Center.

作者信息

Modi Anal, Desai Mira, Shah Samidh, Shah Bela

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Department of Skin and VD, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dermatol. 2019 May-Jun;64(3):250. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_682_16.

DOI:10.4103/ijd.IJD_682_16
PMID:31148872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6537693/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Skin is one of the major target organ for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The incidence of dermatological ADRs among indoor patients in developed countries ranges from 1-3%, whereas in developing countries such as India, it is 2-5%.

AIMS

To analyze the clinical spectrum, seriousness, outcome, causality, severity, and preventability of the cutaneous ADRs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All cutaneous ADRs reported at the Regional Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center between January 2013 to May 2016 were identified and evaluated. A retrospective analysis was carried out for clinical presentation, causality (as per the WHO-UMC scale and the Naranjo'a reactions (ADRs) Severity (Hartwig and Seigel scale), and preventability (Schumock and Thornton criteria) of a said drug.

RESULTS

Out of 2171 ADRs reported during study period, 538 were cutaneous ADRs (24.78%). The most common clinical presentation was maculopapular rash (58.92%) followed by itching (10.59%), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (4.83%). The time relationship of cutaneous ADRs to drug therapy revealed that they can develop within 1 week to 1 year of treatment. Most common causal drug groups were antimicrobials (46%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (18%), and antiepileptics (10%). Polypharmacy was observed in 7% of the cases. Most of the cutaneous ADRs were non-serious (91%), however, 10 were life-threatening and 1 was resulted in death due to the Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Causality category for majority of cutaneous ADRs was possible. Although majority of cutaneous ADRs were moderately severe (81%), however, not preventable (89%).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of cutaneous ADRs is common and they developed within 1 week of therapy. Antimicrobial agents and NSAIDs are the most common implicated drug class. Hence, physicians should closely monitor the patient in the first week while using such therapy for early detection and prevention of cutaneous ADRs.

摘要

引言

皮肤是药物不良反应(ADR)的主要靶器官之一。发达国家住院患者中皮肤ADR的发生率为1%-3%,而在印度等发展中国家,这一比例为2%-5%。

目的

分析皮肤ADR的临床谱、严重程度、转归、因果关系、严重性及可预防性。

材料与方法

确定并评估2013年1月至2016年5月期间区域药物不良反应监测中心报告的所有皮肤ADR。对所述药物的临床表现、因果关系(根据世界卫生组织药物不良反应监测中心量表和纳兰霍量表)、严重程度(哈特维希和西格尔量表)及可预防性(舒莫克和桑顿标准)进行回顾性分析。

结果

在研究期间报告的2171例ADR中,538例为皮肤ADR(24.78%)。最常见的临床表现为斑丘疹(58.92%),其次是瘙痒(10.59%)和史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(4.83%)。皮肤ADR与药物治疗的时间关系显示,它们可在治疗的1周内至1年内出现。最常见的致病药物类别为抗菌药物(46%)、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(18%)和抗癫痫药(10%)。7%的病例存在联合用药情况。大多数皮肤ADR不严重(91%),然而,有10例危及生命,1例因史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征死亡。大多数皮肤ADR的因果关系类别为“可能”。虽然大多数皮肤ADR为中度严重(81%),但不可预防(89%)。

结论

皮肤ADR很常见,且在治疗1周内出现。抗菌药物和NSAIDs是最常见的致病药物类别。因此,医生在使用此类药物治疗时应在第一周密切监测患者,以便早期发现和预防皮肤ADR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdb4/6537693/c2e35f74eee4/IJD-64-250d-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdb4/6537693/13814af40bb5/IJD-64-250d-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdb4/6537693/c2e35f74eee4/IJD-64-250d-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdb4/6537693/13814af40bb5/IJD-64-250d-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdb4/6537693/c2e35f74eee4/IJD-64-250d-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Reported at the Regional ADR Monitoring Center.地区药品不良反应监测中心报告的皮肤药品不良反应分析
Indian J Dermatol. 2019 May-Jun;64(3):250. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_682_16.
2
Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) Reported at an ADR Monitoring Center of a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute in Central India.印度中部一家三级护理教学机构的药品不良反应监测中心报告的皮肤药品不良反应分析
Cureus. 2024 Feb 6;16(2):e53706. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53706. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
An analysis of serious adverse drug reactions at a tertiary care teaching hospital.一家三级护理教学医院严重药物不良反应的分析。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(4):181-186. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.192044.
4
Study of pattern & distribution of adverse drug reactions in acute coronary syndrome patients in a tertiary care hospital.急性冠脉综合征患者中药物不良反应的模式和分布研究。
Indian J Med Res. 2022 Jul;156(1):111-121. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1275_20.
5
Preventability, predictability, severity and causality assessment of adverse drug reactions reported from a teaching hospital in chhattisgarh: A retrospective analysis.恰蒂斯加尔邦一家教学医院报告的药物不良反应的可预防性、可预测性、严重性及因果关系评估:一项回顾性分析
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Jul;10(7):2541-2545. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2374_20. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
An analysis of adverse drug reactions in extremes of age group at tertiary care teaching hospital.三级护理教学医院极端年龄组药物不良反应分析
Perspect Clin Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):70-75. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_64_17.
7
Pharmacovigilance Study of Anticancer Drugs in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in North India: A Retrospective Study.印度北部一家三级护理教学医院抗癌药物的药物警戒研究:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 10;15(9):e44984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44984. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Clinical Pattern and Causality Assessment of Drug-induced Cutaneous Reactions in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India: A Prospective Study.印度一家三级保健医院药物性皮肤反应的临床模式和因果关系评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Curr Drug Saf. 2022;17(3):193-198. doi: 10.2174/1574886316666211026114803.
9
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a 9-year study from a South Indian Hospital.皮肤药物不良反应:来自印度南部一家医院的9年研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):567-70. doi: 10.1002/pds.1105.
10
An observational study of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a teaching hospital.某教学医院皮肤药物不良反应的观察性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Dec;37(6):996-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0161-9. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Encountered in a Tertiary Care Hospital.三级护理医院中皮肤药物不良反应的前瞻性分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 24;16(7):e65284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65284. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Analysis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) Reported at an ADR Monitoring Center of a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute in Central India.印度中部一家三级护理教学机构的药品不良反应监测中心报告的皮肤药品不良反应分析
Cureus. 2024 Feb 6;16(2):e53706. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53706. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Suspected cutaneous adverse drug reactions reported with traditional medicines: analysis of data for United Nations Asia region from WHO VigiBase.

本文引用的文献

1
Causality, severity and preventability assessment of adverse cutaneous drug reaction: a prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital.皮肤药物不良反应的因果关系、严重程度及可预防性评估:一项在三级医疗机构开展的前瞻性观察性研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Dec;7(12):2765-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/7430.3753. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
2
A systematic review of the drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Indian population.印度人群中药物诱导的史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的系统评价。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013 May-Jun;79(3):389-98. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.110749.
3
Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in eastern India.
传统药物报告的疑似皮肤药物不良反应:世卫组织药物不良反应数据库中联合国亚洲区域数据的分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 30;14:1088841. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1088841. eCollection 2023.
4
Manifestation of pityriasis rosea and pityriasis rosea-like eruptions after Covid-19 vaccine: A systematic review.玫瑰糠疹和新冠疫苗接种后出现玫瑰糠疹样疹的表现:系统评价。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023 Apr;11(4):e804. doi: 10.1002/iid3.804.
5
The severity of adverse drug reactions and their influencing factors based on the ADR monitoring center of Henan Province.基于河南省药品不良反应监测中心的不良反应严重程度及其影响因素分析
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99908-3.
6
Surveillance of adverse drug reactions at an adverse drug reaction monitoring centre in Central India: a 7-year surveillance study.印度中部一个药物不良反应监测中心的药物不良反应监测:一项为期 7 年的监测研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 4;11(10):e052737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052737.
7
Comparison of Sensitivities of Skin Prick and Intradermal Tests with Oral Rechallenge Test: A Prospective Interventional Hospital-Based Study.皮肤点刺试验与皮内试验对口服激发试验的敏感性比较:一项基于医院的前瞻性干预研究。
Indian J Dermatol. 2021 Jan-Feb;66(1):55-59. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_554_19.
印度东部一家三级护理门诊的药物不良反应皮肤表现。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2012 Nov-Dec;44(6):792-7. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.103304.
4
A prospective analysis of drug-induced acute cutaneous reactions reported in patients at a tertiary care hospital.对一家三级护理医院患者报告的药物性急性皮肤反应的前瞻性分析。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;42(2):118-9. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.64487.
5
Adverse cutaneous drug reaction.药物性皮肤不良反应
Indian J Dermatol. 2008 Jan;53(1):2-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.39732.
6
Adverse cutaneous drug reactions: clinical pattern and causative agents in a tertiary care center in South India.药物性皮肤不良反应:印度南部一家三级医疗中心的临床模式及致病因素
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2004 Jan-Feb;70(1):20-4.
7
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a 9-year study from a South Indian Hospital.皮肤药物不良反应:来自印度南部一家医院的9年研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):567-70. doi: 10.1002/pds.1105.
8
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: clinical pattern and causative agents--a 6 year series from Chandigarh, India.皮肤药物不良反应:临床模式及致病因素——来自印度昌迪加尔的6年系列研究
J Postgrad Med. 2001 Apr-Jun;47(2):95-9.
9
Cutaneous drug reactions.皮肤药物反应
Pharmacol Rev. 2001 Sep;53(3):357-79.
10
Rates of cutaneous reactions to drugs.药物引起皮肤反应的发生率。
Arch Dermatol. 2001 Jun;137(6):765-70.