Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Danish Epilepsy Centre, Dianalund, Denmark.
Epileptic Disord. 2019 Jun 1;21(S1):31-40. doi: 10.1684/epd.2019.1055.
Since its first description, quantifying the burden of epileptiform abnormalities in sleep EEG has played a fundamental role in the diagnosis of Encephalopathy related to Status Epilepticus during slow Sleep (ESES). In fact, in the 1971 seminal paper by Tassinari's group and in the following studies on this syndrome, the amount of epileptiform discharges (EDs) was calculated as the percentage of slow sleep occupied by spike-and-waves and referred to as "spike and wave index" (SWI). However, nowadays it is becoming increasingly clear that the SWI alone does not explain the whole clinical course of patients affected by ESES. In this paper, we aim to provide a state-of-the-art summary of the quantitative EEG methods currently used in the ESES/CSWS literature, highlighting the possible pitfalls and discrepancies explaining the unsatisfactory correlation between SWI and clinical course. Furthermore; we illustrate a number of methodological refinements - taking into account inter-individual, intra-individual, and temporal variability of EDs - alongside "new" quantitative variables -including ED-related and sleep-related features - potentially useful to reach a reliable electro-clinical correlation in patients with ESES.
自首次描述以来,量化睡眠脑电图中的癫痫样异常在癫痫持续状态相关慢波睡眠期脑病(ESES)的诊断中发挥了重要作用。事实上,在 1971 年 Tassinari 小组的开创性论文以及随后对该综合征的研究中,癫痫样放电(EDs)的数量被计算为棘波和慢波占慢波睡眠的百分比,并称为“棘波和慢波指数”(SWI)。然而,如今越来越清楚的是,SWI 本身并不能解释受 ESES 影响的患者的整个临床过程。在本文中,我们旨在提供目前在 ESES/CSWS 文献中使用的定量脑电图方法的最新综述,强调可能存在的陷阱和差异,这些差异解释了 SWI 与临床过程之间的不满意相关性。此外,我们还说明了一些方法上的改进——考虑到 ED 个体间、个体内和时间变异性,以及“新”的定量变量——包括与 ED 相关和与睡眠相关的特征——这些特征可能有助于在 ESES 患者中建立可靠的电临床相关性。